Hi all,
It's very common in the types of meta-analyses that I perform that some studies do not provide meta-analysable data.
We often use forestplots to help summarise both the pooled effect AND the actual data we have access to.
I cannot find a way using the meta forestplot command to include blank lines for studies with missing data.
Maybe I'm missing something?
This would be super useful.
Cheers,
Simon.
Attached code has a simple example, I would like the output to have Study C included (obviously with missing data where the data is missing)
It's very common in the types of meta-analyses that I perform that some studies do not provide meta-analysable data.
We often use forestplots to help summarise both the pooled effect AND the actual data we have access to.
I cannot find a way using the meta forestplot command to include blank lines for studies with missing data.
Maybe I'm missing something?
This would be super useful.
Cheers,
Simon.
Attached code has a simple example, I would like the output to have Study C included (obviously with missing data where the data is missing)
Code:
* Data is missing from one study, but forestplot only shows those which have data * 1. Create example data with one missing study clear input str20 study es se str20 data_summary "Study A" 0.5 0.1 "n, mean, sd" "Study B" 0.7 0.2 "SMD calculated" "Study C" . . "no data for analysis" // This study has no data "Study D" 0.4 0.1 "n, mean, sd" end * 2. Set the meta-analysis data meta set es se, studylabel(study) * 3. Create the forest plot meta forestplot _id data_summary _plot _es _ci

Comment