Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Confidence intervals in mixed-effects logistic model

    Dear Statalisters,

    I have a dataset collected from 8 countries and ≥20 hospitals. I want to fit a nested, mixed-effect logistic regression (hence has a 3-level) as this reference suggests (Reference). So, I used hospitals nested within countries as random effects and fit the model. However, I get an unexpected 95% CI for the countries (please see below).
    What does that mean? Does it mean no need to include countries as random-effect?

    Code:
    melogit died30in age_sd cci_sd i.(sex cci_htn) ib(frequent).race ib(frequent).infx_source || country: || hospital:, nolog or
    
    
    note: 3.infx_source != 0 predicts failure perfectly;
          3.infx_source omitted and 23 obs not used.
    
    note: 10.infx_source != 0 predicts failure perfectly;
          10.infx_source omitted and 44 obs not used.
    
    
    Mixed-effects logistic regression               Number of obs     =      3,207
    
            Grouping information
            -------------------------------------------------------------
                            |     No. of       Observations per group
             Group variable |     groups    Minimum    Average    Maximum
            ----------------+--------------------------------------------
                    country |          7          6      458.1      1,865
                   hospital |         21          6      152.7        474
            -------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Integration method: mvaghermite                 Integration pts.  =          7
    
                                                    Wald chi2(14)     =     187.86
    Log likelihood = -776.97614                     Prob > chi2       =     0.0000
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          died30in | Odds ratio   Std. err.      z    P>|z|     [95% conf. interval]
    -------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
                            age_sd |   1.218493    .136446     1.76   0.0776     .9783766     1.51754
                            cci_sd |   2.401467   .2392206     8.79   0.0000     1.975535    2.919231
                                   |
                               sex |
                              Man  |          1  (base)
                            Woman  |   1.299266    .180295     1.89   0.0592     .9898734    1.705362
                                   |
                           cci_htn |
                               No  |          1  (base)
                              Yes  |    .861246   .1566368    -0.82   0.4115     .6029999    1.230091
                                   |
                              race |
                            Asian  |   1.034492   .6099411     0.06   0.9541     .3257281    3.285484
                            Black  |   2.072429   .7169011     2.11   0.0352     1.052033    4.082535
                      South Asian  |   2.446634   .8445341     2.59   0.0095     1.243797    4.812696
                            White  |          1  (base)
                                   |
                       infx_source |
                        Abdominal  |   .5330493   .1407734    -2.38   0.0172     .3176676    .8944619
                      Bloodstream  |   1.154067    .336441     0.49   0.6231     .6517534    2.043519
                    Bone & joints  |          1  (empty)
                         COVID-19  |   1.270447   .2622513     1.16   0.2462     .8477109    1.903993
                     Neurological  |   3.828529   2.292373     2.24   0.0250     1.184038    12.37936
    Respiratory (except COVID-19)  |          1  (base)
           Soft/cutaneous tissues  |   .5645505   .1520924    -2.12   0.0338     .3329549    .9572386
                       Urogenital  |    .535857   .1095438    -3.05   0.0023     .3589551    .7999406
                   Unknown source  |    2.90591   1.196004     2.59   0.0095     1.297023    6.510534
                            Other  |          1  (empty)
                                   |
                             _cons |   .0542853   .0176503    -8.96   0.0000     .0287027    .1026696
    -------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    country                        |
                         var(_cons)|   6.01e-34   3.61e-18                             .           .
    -------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    country>hospital               |
                         var(_cons)|   1.287618   .4979894                      .6033688    2.747839
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Note: Estimates are transformed only in the first equation to odds ratios.
    Note: _cons estimates baseline odds (conditional on zero random effects).
    LR test vs. logistic model: chibar2(01) = 150.55      Prob >= chibar2 = 0.0000

    Reference: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, Fourth Edition
    Sincerely regards,
    Abdullah Algarni
    [email protected]

  • #2
    Take a look at the value of the variance at the country level: 6.01e-34. That means that, at least after adjustment for everything else in the model, there is, for practical purposes, 0 variance at the country level. Country just doesn't matter here. When a variance component in a model is very close to zero, Stata has a lot of difficulty even estimating it, and even more difficulty in calculating a confidence interval. But really, in this situation, all that matters is that the variance at that level is negligible. In fact, I would recommend rerunning the model and omitting the country level altogether.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you so much Clyde Schechter ,, that was very helpful; I have omitted the country level altogether
      Sincerely regards,
      Abdullah Algarni
      [email protected]

      Comment

      Working...
      X