Note that I use synth from SSC. Consider the following
The resulting matrix
is a 13 by 13 revulsion that looks ugly to me. Shame on the coders for making it be like that- but enough ranting. My question is, how would I delete the 0s from this matrix such that we have something like
and so on and so forth for each predictor. A colleague wanted to know how to present the matrix in his paper, but, I wanted to show him a way that gives an informative, clear answer, and the present way the matrix looks is, to me, cumbersome. How might I tackle this?
Code:
cls
u "http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/s/scul_basque.dta", clear
qui xtset
local lbl: value label `r(panelvar)'
loc unit ="Basque Country (Pais Vasco)":`lbl'
loc int_time = 1975
qui xtset
cls
loc x 1961(1)1969
loc y 1960(1)1969
loc z 1964(1)1969
tempfile scmbasque scmbasque2
cls
synth gdpcap /// classic SCM
gdpcap(`y') ///
pop(1969) ///
sec_agriculture(`x') ///
sec_energy(`x') ///
sec_industry(`x') ///
sec_construction(`x') ///
sec_svc_venta(`x') ///
sec_svc_nonventa(`x') ///
school_illit(`z') ///
school_prim(`z') ///
school_med(`z') ///
school_high(`z') ///
invest(`z'), ///
trunit(`unit') ///
trperiod(`int_time') ///
fig nested allopt keep(`scmbasque')
mat li e(V_matrix)
Code:
symmetric e(V_matrix)[13,13]
gdpcap~1969) pop(1969) sec_ag~1969) sec_en~1969) sec_in~1969) sec_co~1969) sec_sv~1969)
gdpcap~1969) .28494051
pop(1969) 0 .08034821
sec_ag~1969) 0 0 .01250346
sec_en~1969) 0 0 0 .15639678
sec_in~1969) 0 0 0 0 .15177799
sec_co~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 .00277837
sec_sv~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00470292
sec_sv~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
invest~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
sec_sv~1969) school~1969) school~1969) school~1969) school~1969) invest~1969)
sec_sv~1969) .00466699
school~1969) 0 .01746123
school~1969) 0 0 .00170478
school~1969) 0 0 0 .20263447
school~1969) 0 0 0 0 .0674579
invest~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 .01262639
Code:
Predictor | V Weight
-----------------------------+------------
gdpcap~1969) | .28494051
pop(1969) | .08034821

Comment