Note that I use synth from SSC. Consider the following
The resulting matrix
is a 13 by 13 revulsion that looks ugly to me. Shame on the coders for making it be like that- but enough ranting. My question is, how would I delete the 0s from this matrix such that we have something like
and so on and so forth for each predictor. A colleague wanted to know how to present the matrix in his paper, but, I wanted to show him a way that gives an informative, clear answer, and the present way the matrix looks is, to me, cumbersome. How might I tackle this?
Code:
cls u "http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/s/scul_basque.dta", clear qui xtset local lbl: value label `r(panelvar)' loc unit ="Basque Country (Pais Vasco)":`lbl' loc int_time = 1975 qui xtset cls loc x 1961(1)1969 loc y 1960(1)1969 loc z 1964(1)1969 tempfile scmbasque scmbasque2 cls synth gdpcap /// classic SCM gdpcap(`y') /// pop(1969) /// sec_agriculture(`x') /// sec_energy(`x') /// sec_industry(`x') /// sec_construction(`x') /// sec_svc_venta(`x') /// sec_svc_nonventa(`x') /// school_illit(`z') /// school_prim(`z') /// school_med(`z') /// school_high(`z') /// invest(`z'), /// trunit(`unit') /// trperiod(`int_time') /// fig nested allopt keep(`scmbasque') mat li e(V_matrix)
Code:
symmetric e(V_matrix)[13,13] gdpcap~1969) pop(1969) sec_ag~1969) sec_en~1969) sec_in~1969) sec_co~1969) sec_sv~1969) gdpcap~1969) .28494051 pop(1969) 0 .08034821 sec_ag~1969) 0 0 .01250346 sec_en~1969) 0 0 0 .15639678 sec_in~1969) 0 0 0 0 .15177799 sec_co~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 .00277837 sec_sv~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00470292 sec_sv~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 school~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 invest~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sec_sv~1969) school~1969) school~1969) school~1969) school~1969) invest~1969) sec_sv~1969) .00466699 school~1969) 0 .01746123 school~1969) 0 0 .00170478 school~1969) 0 0 0 .20263447 school~1969) 0 0 0 0 .0674579 invest~1969) 0 0 0 0 0 .01262639
Code:
Predictor | V Weight -----------------------------+------------ gdpcap~1969) | .28494051 pop(1969) | .08034821
Comment