Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • conformability error r(503) after esttab after oaxaca

    Dear all,

    when I run

    Code:
    oaxaca rif_1 dobnos dobnos2 prosdob prosdob2 ///
                 spolnosM spolnosF ///
                 obraznos1 obraznos2 obraznos3 ///
                 udiobezdoh ///
                 udioneaktivnih ///
                 udiotransfera ///
                 urban rural [aw=w] ///
                 , by(godina) weight(.5) relax swap  ///
                   categorical(spolnosM spolnosF, ///
                               obraznos1 obraznos2 obraznos3, ///
                               urban rural) ///
                   detail(Dob: dobnos dobnos2 prosdob prosdob2, ///
                          Spol: spolnosM spolnosF, ///
                          Obrazovanje: obraznos1 obraznos2 obraznos3, ///
                          Tip naselja: urban rural)
    esttab using "F:\DOKTORSKI\poverty\RIF_decomp\QUANTILE_results_08-11_FINIJAPODJELA", tab not nogap nostar replace
    I get the following error message

    Code:
    conformability error
    r(503);
    I ran the same code before, and everything worked perfectly well, but now it does not. Does anyone knows what is going on?

    Thank you.

    Ivica
    // ivica_rubil //

  • #2
    did you solve it? i have the same error note with oaxaca

    Comment


    • #3
      Please help us help you. Run your esttab command again with set trace on, and find out what call in the program is producing the error. In addition, try running the esttab again without any options, and then again adding each one, one at time -- is it a particular option that's causing the problem or the base code?

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello,
        I am having the same error with my Blinde-Oaxaca decomposition. It works very well on a larger sample.

        I used the set trace on, but I am not able to identifie the problem. Can anyone help?
        I can send the trace on report, details!
        Thanks

        Comment


        • #5
          This is more likely a matrix problem. I just ran and also met a similar question. Then I tried set different dependent variables and finally found that it is becasue I put female in "by( )" into dependent variable sets. I mean, you can also try different sets to find out the problem.

          Comment

          Working...
          X