Hello,
I am running a panel regression for 51 US states and 10 years (2010-2019) with state and year fixed effects. I have a lagged dependent variable in my model. Even though the number of time periods is not too small, I am worried about the Nickell bias. Hence, I want to run a system GMM for robustness. I am inclined to use the command xtdpdsys for this purpose. I have some questions in this respect --
1. Is this better than xtabond and xtabond2? I know that xtabond does not do system GMM but not sure about xtabond2.
2. If I use the command xtdpdsys, how many lags of the dependent variable to be used as instruments should be specified inside maxldep()? I think 2 is a good number to go with to avoid proliferation of instruments and overidentification but not sure.
3. In the results I obtain from xtdpdsys, the 2010 year dummy gets omitted which I understand is because of the first year being a benchmark for the year dummies. However, I was expecting that the estimate for one more year would not be reported (2011) because of the generation of lags for the dependent variable. That did not happen though. I wonder why.
I will appreciate any help in this regard.
I am running a panel regression for 51 US states and 10 years (2010-2019) with state and year fixed effects. I have a lagged dependent variable in my model. Even though the number of time periods is not too small, I am worried about the Nickell bias. Hence, I want to run a system GMM for robustness. I am inclined to use the command xtdpdsys for this purpose. I have some questions in this respect --
1. Is this better than xtabond and xtabond2? I know that xtabond does not do system GMM but not sure about xtabond2.
2. If I use the command xtdpdsys, how many lags of the dependent variable to be used as instruments should be specified inside maxldep()? I think 2 is a good number to go with to avoid proliferation of instruments and overidentification but not sure.
3. In the results I obtain from xtdpdsys, the 2010 year dummy gets omitted which I understand is because of the first year being a benchmark for the year dummies. However, I was expecting that the estimate for one more year would not be reported (2011) because of the generation of lags for the dependent variable. That did not happen though. I wonder why.
I will appreciate any help in this regard.

Comment