I would like to announce that fejiv, a Stata module for fixed effect jackknife IV (FEJIV) estimation, is now available on SSC.
fejiv implements the fixed effect jackknife IV (FEJIV) estimator of Chao, Swanson, and Woutersen (2023), which enables consistent IV estimation with many (possibly weak) instruments, cluster fixed effects, heteroskedastic errors, and possibly many exogenous explanatory variables.
Consistency of the FEJIV estimator requires that instrument strength satisfies a key growth condition: the concentration parameter must grow faster than the square root of the number of instruments. Mikusheva and Sun (2022) show that this condition is necessary for the existence of a consistent estimator and also propose a test of it, implemented in the Stata command manyweakivpretest, available on Liyang Sun's GitHub.
One of my recent papers ("When Should We (Not) Interpret Linear IV Estimands as LATE?"; available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06695) recommends the FEJIV estimator as an alternative to two-stage least squares (2SLS) when estimating the fully interacted specification of Angrist and Imbens (1995). Within the local average treatment effect (LATE) framework, when strong monotonicity is doubtful but weak monotonicity is plausible, the fully interacted specification eliminates the problem of "negative weights."
fejiv implements the fixed effect jackknife IV (FEJIV) estimator of Chao, Swanson, and Woutersen (2023), which enables consistent IV estimation with many (possibly weak) instruments, cluster fixed effects, heteroskedastic errors, and possibly many exogenous explanatory variables.
Consistency of the FEJIV estimator requires that instrument strength satisfies a key growth condition: the concentration parameter must grow faster than the square root of the number of instruments. Mikusheva and Sun (2022) show that this condition is necessary for the existence of a consistent estimator and also propose a test of it, implemented in the Stata command manyweakivpretest, available on Liyang Sun's GitHub.
One of my recent papers ("When Should We (Not) Interpret Linear IV Estimands as LATE?"; available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06695) recommends the FEJIV estimator as an alternative to two-stage least squares (2SLS) when estimating the fully interacted specification of Angrist and Imbens (1995). Within the local average treatment effect (LATE) framework, when strong monotonicity is doubtful but weak monotonicity is plausible, the fully interacted specification eliminates the problem of "negative weights."

Comment