Question my second stage output is:
Summary results for first-stage regressions
-------------------------------------------
(Underid) (Weak id)
Variable | F( 2, 123) P-val | SW Chi-sq( 1) P-val | SW F( 1, 123)
pdiv_aa | 54.85 0.0000 | 47.09 0.0000 | 39.95
pdiv_aa_sqr | 60.29 0.0000 | 51.35 0.0000 | 43.56
-------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
pdiv_aa | 827.9654 309.5326 2.67 0.007 221.2928 1434.638
pdiv_aa_sqr | -605.2247 213.5579 -2.83 0.005 -1023.79 -186.659
abslat | -29.77723 34.70237 -0.86 0.391 -97.79264 38.23817
ruggavg | -26.4531 20.99064 -1.26 0.208 -67.594 14.6878
elevavg | -2.059891 5.695568 -0.36 0.718 -13.223 9.103217
suitavg | -12.9747 6.915493 -1.88 0.061 -26.52882 .5794151
suitrng | -.4241705 6.7037 -0.06 0.950 -13.56318 12.71484
distcr | -14.45389 4.185995 -3.45 0.001 -22.65829 -6.249489
ln_Land_area_sq_km | -.1572494 .1191065 -1.32 0.187 -.3906938 .0761951
kgatr | -1.624356 .6316154 -2.57 0.010 -2.862299 -.3864122
asia | -.8476551 .4984571 -1.70 0.089 -1.824613 .1293029
namerica | .1946483 .8980334 0.22 0.828 -1.565465 1.954761
samerica | -.6844802 .9154519 -0.75 0.455 -2.478733 1.109773
europe | 1.030554 .7091502 1.45 0.146 -.3593553 2.420462
oceania | .5488568 1.657152 0.33 0.740 -2.699101 3.796815
efrac | -.2920346 .8056488 -0.36 0.717 -1.871077 1.287008
des_pol15 | -1.151414 .7883847 -1.46 0.144 -2.69662 .3937912
evercol_gbr | .8239021 .3722575 2.21 0.027 .0942909 1.553513
evercol_fra | -.1336626 .3332296 -0.40 0.688 -.7867806 .5194554
evercol_oth | -.3046437 .3578258 -0.85 0.395 -1.005969 .396682
mean1996_2023_temp | -.1467547 .0540767 -2.71 0.007 -.2527431 -.0407663
_cons | -274.0316 111.8777 -2.45 0.014 -493.308 -54.7553
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 12.313
Chi-sq(1) P-val = 0.0004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 19.188
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 7.746
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 7.03
15% maximal IV size 4.58
20% maximal IV size 3.95
25% maximal IV size 3.63
From that I read that my instruments are not weak.
However in the first stage the coeffiecients of the two instruments are not significant does that matter in that case?
Summary results for first-stage regressions
-------------------------------------------
(Underid) (Weak id)
Variable | F( 2, 123) P-val | SW Chi-sq( 1) P-val | SW F( 1, 123)
pdiv_aa | 54.85 0.0000 | 47.09 0.0000 | 39.95
pdiv_aa_sqr | 60.29 0.0000 | 51.35 0.0000 | 43.56
-------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
pdiv_aa | 827.9654 309.5326 2.67 0.007 221.2928 1434.638
pdiv_aa_sqr | -605.2247 213.5579 -2.83 0.005 -1023.79 -186.659
abslat | -29.77723 34.70237 -0.86 0.391 -97.79264 38.23817
ruggavg | -26.4531 20.99064 -1.26 0.208 -67.594 14.6878
elevavg | -2.059891 5.695568 -0.36 0.718 -13.223 9.103217
suitavg | -12.9747 6.915493 -1.88 0.061 -26.52882 .5794151
suitrng | -.4241705 6.7037 -0.06 0.950 -13.56318 12.71484
distcr | -14.45389 4.185995 -3.45 0.001 -22.65829 -6.249489
ln_Land_area_sq_km | -.1572494 .1191065 -1.32 0.187 -.3906938 .0761951
kgatr | -1.624356 .6316154 -2.57 0.010 -2.862299 -.3864122
asia | -.8476551 .4984571 -1.70 0.089 -1.824613 .1293029
namerica | .1946483 .8980334 0.22 0.828 -1.565465 1.954761
samerica | -.6844802 .9154519 -0.75 0.455 -2.478733 1.109773
europe | 1.030554 .7091502 1.45 0.146 -.3593553 2.420462
oceania | .5488568 1.657152 0.33 0.740 -2.699101 3.796815
efrac | -.2920346 .8056488 -0.36 0.717 -1.871077 1.287008
des_pol15 | -1.151414 .7883847 -1.46 0.144 -2.69662 .3937912
evercol_gbr | .8239021 .3722575 2.21 0.027 .0942909 1.553513
evercol_fra | -.1336626 .3332296 -0.40 0.688 -.7867806 .5194554
evercol_oth | -.3046437 .3578258 -0.85 0.395 -1.005969 .396682
mean1996_2023_temp | -.1467547 .0540767 -2.71 0.007 -.2527431 -.0407663
_cons | -274.0316 111.8777 -2.45 0.014 -493.308 -54.7553
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 12.313
Chi-sq(1) P-val = 0.0004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 19.188
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 7.746
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 7.03
15% maximal IV size 4.58
20% maximal IV size 3.95
25% maximal IV size 3.63
From that I read that my instruments are not weak.
However in the first stage the coeffiecients of the two instruments are not significant does that matter in that case?
Comment