I am trying to find the presence of unit root or otherwise in my variables using the -multipurt- command, especially the CIPS test suggested by Pesaran (2007). However, I find that at lag 0, my variable is I(0), whereas it is I(1) at deeper lags. In this case, should I treat the variable as I(0) or I(1)?
This is going to be useful in deciding whether I proceed with a Johansen cointegration test (which requires all the series to be I(1) or a bounds-based Cointegration test as suggested by Pesaran, Sin, and Smith (2001), which is suitable in case we have a mix of I(0) and I(1) variables. The code and the results are as follows.
Thanks in anticipation of an useful suggestion.
Regards
pankaj
This is going to be useful in deciding whether I proceed with a Johansen cointegration test (which requires all the series to be I(1) or a bounds-based Cointegration test as suggested by Pesaran, Sin, and Smith (2001), which is suitable in case we have a mix of I(0) and I(1) variables. The code and the results are as follows.
Code:
multipurt Stab_Low_T, lags(2)
Code:
First and Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests
Variables tested: Stab_Low_T
Group variable: ID
Number of groups: 39
Total # of observations: 526+
Average # of observations: 13.56+
Panel is unbalanced and has gaps
+ Full sample statistics prior to testing.
----------------------------------------------------
(A) Maddala and Wu (1999) Panel Unit Root test (MW)
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
| Specification without trend
-------------+--------------------------------------
Variable | lags chi_sq p-value
-------------+--------------------------------------
Stab_Low_T | 0 634.984 0.000
Stab_Low_T | 1 623.691 0.000
Stab_Low_T | 2 190.263 0.000
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
| Specification with trend
-------------+--------------------------------------
Variable | lags chi_sq p-value
-------------+--------------------------------------
Stab_Low_T | 0 318.359 0.000
Stab_Low_T | 1 358.784 0.000
Stab_Low_T | 2 211.316 0.000
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
(B) Pesaran (2007) Panel Unit Root test (CIPS)
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
| Specification without trend
-------------+--------------------------------------
Variable | lags Zt-bar p-value t-bar
-------------+--------------------------------------
Stab_Low_T | 0 -6.126 0.000 .
Stab_Low_T | 1 -1.321 0.093 .
Stab_Low_T | 2 4.843 1.000 .
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
| Specification with trend
-------------+--------------------------------------
Variable | lags Zt-bar p-value t-bar
-------------+--------------------------------------
Stab_Low_T | 0 -7.658 0.000 .
Stab_Low_T | 1 -0.664 0.253 .
Stab_Low_T | 2 7.498 1.000 .
----------------------------------------------------
Null for MW and CIPS tests: series is I(1).
MW test assumes cross-section independence.
CIPS test assumes cross-section dependence is in
form of a single unobserved common factor.
-multipurt- uses Scott Merryman's -xtfisher- and
Piotr Lewandowski's -pescadf-.
Thanks in anticipation of an useful suggestion.
Regards
pankaj

Comment