Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ivprobit and marginal effects

    I applied IV probit model and then applied marginal effects. The value of coefficient and standard error is same in both estimations however in case of simple probit regression and marginal effects, they are different. Am I doing it right?

  • #2
    The default is -predict(xb)- for margins after ivprobit. See

    Code:
    help ivprobit_postestimation##margins

    If you want to predict the probability of a positive outcome, specify:

    Code:
    margins, dydx(*) predict(pr)

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Andrew Musau View Post
      The default is -predict(xb)- for margins after ivprobit. See

      Code:
      help ivprobit_postestimation##margins

      If you want to predict the probability of a positive outcome, specify:

      Code:
      margins, dydx(*) predict(pr)
      Thanks Andrew.
      I have two more confusions if you can help me out.
      1. Should I include fitted value or the instrument variable in my ivprobit command (which I was considering as 2nd step of tsls)?
      2. Is there any issue if I just report the values of marginal effects rather than both coefficients and marginal effects in my table?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Zainab Ali View Post
        1. Should I include fitted value or the instrument variable in my ivprobit command (which I was considering as 2nd step of tsls)?
        ivprobit is for a binary outcome with continuous endogenous variables, where the errors are assumed to be normally distributed. See

        Code:
        help ivprobit
        ivregress will implement 2SLS, so you don't need to implement the steps separately. In any case, 2SLS applies linear regression in both steps.

        2. Is there any issue if I just report the values of marginal effects rather than both coefficients and marginal effects in my table?
        Assuming #1 is done correctly, you can report marginal effects alone. There is no issue with that.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey Andrew, I really appreciate your help. My concern is if ivprobit is performed in 1step or 2 steps? As IV is used in 2 stages as per my knowledge so does it mean I should include the fitted value in ivprobit command which I considered the 2nd step? Please enlighten me in this regard. Thanks

          Comment


          • #6
            Andrew Musau also I came to know that ivprobit should be applied to continuous endogenous variable. My endogenous variable is age at the time of marriage which is given in complete years like 15, 16, 17,... 25. Should I consider it a continuous variable or discrete? And if discrete how to fix my regression?

            Comment


            • #7
              Read the documentation.

              Code:
              help ivprobit
              There is the maximum likelihood estimator that does the estimation in a single step and there is Newey's two step estimator implemented via the option -twostep-. Either way, the command does all the steps for you, so there is no manual coding involved. #6: Age can be treated as a continuous variable.

              Comment

              Working...
              X