Network meta-analysis for survival data and input is log(hazard ratio) and standard error(log hazard ratio)

[MYVIZHI KANNAN]

hello anybody could help me. I recently practice a NMA specifically survival data what i have is ln(HR) and SE(lnHR). based on "network import" command i set a network data format

network import, tr(t1 t2) eff(lnhr) study(study_name) stderr(selnhr)

network map i get it using this code

network map

The issue i have is in that one study was multi-arm trail(3 arm) and study name is Llovet et al. 2002 due to this i cant able to run further codes like

network meta consistency
network meta consistency, fixed
network forest, msize (*0.15) diamond eform xlabel (0.1 1 10 100) colors (black blue red) list
intervalplot, eform null (1) labels (Network Meta Analysis Covid) textsize (2) xlabel (0.01 0.1 1 10)
network rank min, line cumulative xlabel (1/4) seed (10000) reps (10000) meanrank
network rank min, seed(48106) all line cumul reps(10000) meanrank
network rank max, all zero gen(prob)
sucra prob*, rankogr

this is reference articel where i took the data https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184597 And below table is data
and i also attached both excel file and error picture

study_name t1 t2 n1 n2 logHR SE Pelletier et al. 1990 1 9 21 21 0.2971 0.3988 Madden et al. 1993 1 9 25 25 0.0276 0.3487 Groupe d'Etude et al. 1995 1 9 50 46 -0.3407 0.225 Pelletier et al. 1998 1 9 37 36 -0.0834 0.2694 Llovet et al. 2002 1 9 40 35 -0.755 0.3371 Lo et al. 2002 1 9 40 39 -0.6932 0.2461 FFCD 9402 et al. 2208 1 9 62 61 -0.0773 0.1873 Mabed et al. 2009 1 9 50 50 -0.4185 0.239 Lin et al. 1988 4 9 42 21 -0.9239 0.3291 Bruix et al. 1998 4 9 40 40 0.0926 0.2582 Llovet et al. 2002 4 9 37 35 -0.5621 0.3068 Raoul et al. 1994 3 9 14 13 -1.1394 0.3217 Kawai et al. 1991 4 1 137 145 -0.2114 0.1683 Chang et al. 1994 4 1 24 22 -0.3147 0.2803 Meyer et al. 2013 4 1 42 44 -0.0943 0.2943 Yu et al. 2014 4 1 45 45 -0.1898 0.2901 Raoul et al. 1997 3 1 73 69 -0.2157 0.2396 Kolligs et al. 2015 3 1 13 15 0.758 0.6565 Salem et al. 2016 3 1 24 21 -0.0058 0.4595 Sacco et al. 2011 2 1 33 34 0.0268 0.5346 Golfieri et al. 2014 2 1 89 88 -0.0151 0.2343 Malagari et al. 2009 2 4 41 43 0.0334 0.6022 Brown et al. 2015 2 4 50 51 -0.1044 0.228 Pitton et al. 2015 2 3 12 12 0.0489 0.5345 Li et al. 2009 8 1 108 108 -0.1092 0.0368 Kudo et al. 2011 8 1 229 227 0.0583 0.2209 Britten et al. 2011 8 1 15 15 0.734 0.5855 Inaba et al. 2013 8 1 50 51 0.0583 0.3092 Kudo et al. 2014 8 1 249 253 -0.1054 0.1588 Printer et al. 2015 8 1 16 16 0.5306 0.3837 Wang et al. 2015 8 1 61 64 -0.9943 0.3159 Lencioni et al. 2016 7 2 154 153 -0.1076 0.2005 Bartolozzi et al. 1995 6 1 26 27 -0.734 0.4059 Yamamoto et al. 1997 6 1 50 50 -0.6162 0.2069 Wu et al. 1998 6 1 50 52 -0.9416 0.2728 Xu et al. 2002 6 1 23 22 -0.4943 0.1798 Becker et al. 2005 6 1 27 25 -0.3567 0.2657 Yang et al. 2008 6 1 24 11 -0.5798 0.4793 Liu et al. 2009 6 1 39 39 -0.6539 0.378 Zhao et al. 2011 6 1 23 24 -0.6349 0.2551 Huang et al. 2017 6 1 60 60 -0.6349 0.1972 Xue et al. 1995 5 1 21 20 -0.6733 0.3062 Leng et al. 2000 5 1 36 39 -0.478 0.2351 Peng et al. 2000 5 1 43 48 -0.5108 0.1588 Wang et al. 2000 5 1 20 20 -0.2357 0.2042 Li et al. 2003 5 1 41 41 -0.6539 0.2151 Zhao et al. 2006 5 1 49 47 -0.7133 0.206 Wang et al. 2006 5 1 54 54 -0.5621 0.1927 Shang et al. 2007 5 1 40 36 -0.478 0.226 Xiao et al. 2008 5 1 30 30 -0.4155 0.2604 Liao et al. 2010 5 1 24 24 -0.3285 0.2247 Zhang et al. 2012 5 1 135 124 -0.5276 0.1525

[MYVIZHI KANNAN]

anyone could give solution for this error

[MYVIZHI KANNAN]

i tried in changing the data format also like pairs to agumented

network convert augmented, large(1000) ref(1)
network meta consistency

and i attach the error what i get is