Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gravity model - tariffs not significant - ppmlhdfe with exp-time, imp-time, and country pair FEs

    I want to get elasticity estimates, through the coefficient of the tariffs. I have an intra-national and international trade data, every 3 years from 2001-2019, with corresponding tariffs from the MAcMap-HS6 database of the CEPII (Guimbard et al., 2012).

    Can anyone help explain why, my variable of interest tariffs, is only significant if and only if I include country pair fixed effects (FEs) only, and not in combination with exporter-time and importer-time FEs?
    • Significant - only country pair fixed effects
      ppmlhdfe exports lntariff, absorb(Exporter#Importer) cluster(Exporter#Importer)
    • Significant, but wrong sign (coefficient of tariffs is positive; with exporter-time and importer-time FEs)
      ppmlhdfe exports lntariff, absorb(Exporter#year Importer#year Exporter#Importer) cluster(Exporter#Importer)
    • Insignificant (only exporter-time and importer time FEs)
      ppmlhdfe exports lntariff, absorb(Exporter#year Importer#year) cluster(Exporter#Importer)
    If it matters, I run an OLS with exp-time and imp-time FEs, and the signs of my coefficients are correct.










  • #2
    Dear Gerome Retamal,

    First of all, ignore OLS results :-)

    If you have intra-national trade, you need to account for that. What is becoming standard is to create a dummy for international trade, say, inter, and absorb inter#year. You should also make sure you have a large number of countries.

    Best wishes,

    Joao

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Joao Santos Silva,

      That is helpful. I did the dummy for international trade. Although, the coefficient of tariffs is still non-significant.

      May I ask, how to interpret the inter#year? Is it a fixed effect of intra-national (domestic) flow? What does it represent?

      And do you have recommended study to cite that used dummy for international trade, and does becoming standard?

      Thank you for the help.

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Gerome Retamal,

        It is simply a way to take into account that intra- and inter-national trade are very different and that the difference can change over time. See

        Baier, S., Y. Yotov, and T. Zylkin (2019): “On the Widely Differing Effects of Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from Twenty Years of Trade Integration,” Journal of International Economics, 116, 206–226.

        Bergstrand, J., M. Larch, and Y. Yotov (2015): “Economic Integration Agreements, Border Effects, and Distance Elasticities in the Gravity Equation,” European Economic Review, 78, 307–327

        Best wishes,

        Joao

        Comment

        Working...
        X