I am doing a study on Willingness to Pay for Renewable Electricity using a Double-Bound Contingent Valuation model and analysed it in stata using the guide provided by Alejandro Lopez-Feldman (2012). However, the results showed a high standard error as follows:
doubleb bid1 bid2 wtp1 wtp2 ngo
initial: log likelihood = -<inf> (could not be evaluated)
feasible: log likelihood = -13779.517
rescale: log likelihood = -892.07509
rescale eq: log likelihood = -710.1219
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -710.1219
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -699.37483
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -699.01164
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -699.01147
Iteration 4: log likelihood = -699.01147
Number of obs = 400
Wald chi2(1) = 5.62
Log likelihood = -699.01147 Prob > chi2 = 0.0178
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
Beta |
ngo | 141.8417 59.83623 2.37 0.018 24.56488 259.1186
_cons | 2395.434 41.96212 57.09 0.000 2313.19 2477.678
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
Sigma |
_cons | 548.7313 26.17672 20.96 0.000 497.4259 600.0368
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Bid Variable: bid1
Second-Bid Variable: bid2
First-Response Dummy Variable: wtp1
Second-Response Dummy Variable: wtp2
May I know what does this entail (because the p value is significant)? Will it be a problem when I write the discussion and interpretation part of my study?
doubleb bid1 bid2 wtp1 wtp2 ngo
initial: log likelihood = -<inf> (could not be evaluated)
feasible: log likelihood = -13779.517
rescale: log likelihood = -892.07509
rescale eq: log likelihood = -710.1219
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -710.1219
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -699.37483
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -699.01164
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -699.01147
Iteration 4: log likelihood = -699.01147
Number of obs = 400
Wald chi2(1) = 5.62
Log likelihood = -699.01147 Prob > chi2 = 0.0178
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
Beta |
ngo | 141.8417 59.83623 2.37 0.018 24.56488 259.1186
_cons | 2395.434 41.96212 57.09 0.000 2313.19 2477.678
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
Sigma |
_cons | 548.7313 26.17672 20.96 0.000 497.4259 600.0368
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Bid Variable: bid1
Second-Bid Variable: bid2
First-Response Dummy Variable: wtp1
Second-Response Dummy Variable: wtp2
May I know what does this entail (because the p value is significant)? Will it be a problem when I write the discussion and interpretation part of my study?
Comment