Hello. I have a question regarding the use of fixed effects with fgologit2.
I'm analyzing the determinants of attitudes on who should be covered in a cash transfer program from children. I planned on using ordered logit because the dependent variable (cashtranscov) ranges from 1 (transfers should only cover children in extreme poverty) to 4 (transfers should cover all children). The data is from a survey of seven countries, so I'm using country fixed effects (i.PAIS).
gologit2 cashtranscov mujer Quintiles educacion formality laborincome P7_Ninos_2 b2.edadcat bonorecip foodaid urbano evangelico etnia_blanco i.PAIS, or
The ordered logit failed the Brandt test, so I tried gologit2. It corrected for the variables that failed the Brant test.
gologit2 cashtranscov mujer Quintiles educacion formality laborincome P7_Ninos_2 b2.edadcat b4.vote_choice2 ineqviews taxrich P15_VAL_MANODURAr bonorecip foodaid urbano evangelico etnia_blanco i.PAIS, or autofit lrforce store(mod1)
Step 18: Constraints for parallel lines are not imposed for
Quintiles (P Value = 0.01343)
educacion (P Value = 0.00356)
1.edadcat (P Value = 0.00006)
evangelico (P Value = 0.00201)
4.PAIS (P Value = 0.00775)
5.PAIS (P Value = 0.00000)
6.PAIS (P Value = 0.00005)
7.PAIS (P Value = 0.00000)
Is it a problem that running gologit2 leads to differing coefficients for some of the country dummy variables? Should I impose constraints on all of them? Should I not impose constraints on any?
Is there something else I should be doing?
I looked into feologit, but as far as I could tell it was for panel data. My survey is only cross-sectional.
Any help and all suggestions would be welcome,
Fabian
I'm analyzing the determinants of attitudes on who should be covered in a cash transfer program from children. I planned on using ordered logit because the dependent variable (cashtranscov) ranges from 1 (transfers should only cover children in extreme poverty) to 4 (transfers should cover all children). The data is from a survey of seven countries, so I'm using country fixed effects (i.PAIS).
gologit2 cashtranscov mujer Quintiles educacion formality laborincome P7_Ninos_2 b2.edadcat bonorecip foodaid urbano evangelico etnia_blanco i.PAIS, or
The ordered logit failed the Brandt test, so I tried gologit2. It corrected for the variables that failed the Brant test.
gologit2 cashtranscov mujer Quintiles educacion formality laborincome P7_Ninos_2 b2.edadcat b4.vote_choice2 ineqviews taxrich P15_VAL_MANODURAr bonorecip foodaid urbano evangelico etnia_blanco i.PAIS, or autofit lrforce store(mod1)
Step 18: Constraints for parallel lines are not imposed for
Quintiles (P Value = 0.01343)
educacion (P Value = 0.00356)
1.edadcat (P Value = 0.00006)
evangelico (P Value = 0.00201)
4.PAIS (P Value = 0.00775)
5.PAIS (P Value = 0.00000)
6.PAIS (P Value = 0.00005)
7.PAIS (P Value = 0.00000)
Is it a problem that running gologit2 leads to differing coefficients for some of the country dummy variables? Should I impose constraints on all of them? Should I not impose constraints on any?
Is there something else I should be doing?
I looked into feologit, but as far as I could tell it was for panel data. My survey is only cross-sectional.
Any help and all suggestions would be welcome,
Fabian
Comment