Hi all,
I am currently developing a mixed effects regression model with household as level 1 and cluster as level 2 for a two-phase, two-stage survey. I have STATA 17 running on Windows IOS. I am utilizing svy: meglm with a binomial family and logit link for my primary models. I have read through plenty of STATA17's svy estimation documentation and am finding little guidance for my question:
How can I compare nested models with the output provided by the svy: meglm command?
I am aware that Likelihood Ratio Testing and AIC/BIC are inappropriate for evaluating mixed effect models. Alternatively, Logit gof does not work in STATA 17. I aim to determine the most parsimonious model for a binary nutrition outcome.
A professor recommended I use the F-statistic and associated p-value to compare - if that is appropriate, how do I do that?
Thanks!
Model 1 output:
:
Model 2 output:
I am currently developing a mixed effects regression model with household as level 1 and cluster as level 2 for a two-phase, two-stage survey. I have STATA 17 running on Windows IOS. I am utilizing svy: meglm with a binomial family and logit link for my primary models. I have read through plenty of STATA17's svy estimation documentation and am finding little guidance for my question:
How can I compare nested models with the output provided by the svy: meglm command?
I am aware that Likelihood Ratio Testing and AIC/BIC are inappropriate for evaluating mixed effect models. Alternatively, Logit gof does not work in STATA 17. I aim to determine the most parsimonious model for a binary nutrition outcome.
A professor recommended I use the F-statistic and associated p-value to compare - if that is appropriate, how do I do that?
Thanks!
Model 1 output:
:
Model 2 output:
Comment