Dear Statalist users,
I received a reviewer comment on an analysis using a fixed-effects logit model via the clogit command in Stata 17.0. The model has a binary outcome care_ind and we are interested in modelling the interaction of two nominal variables care_ind_previous and child_employment_change2.
The first version of the manuscript reports the regression parameters in terms of odds ratios, but the interpretation is quite complicated and even inappropriate (e.g. the need to test different reference categories) to test the paper hypotheses. The suggestion to present the results by means of predicted probabilities and marginal effects could resolve a lot of issues that are currently present in the analysis. However, I learned from previous forum posts here and this presentation that this makes no sense (given that the predictions assume that the fixed effect is zero), although this is offered in Stata's postestimation options for clogit and xtlogit, fe. Does this hold for categorical covariates as well? In any case, the margins results do seem to make sense and are in line with main conclusions taken from the regression parameters at first glance.
Thanking you in advance for the advice!
I received a reviewer comment on an analysis using a fixed-effects logit model via the clogit command in Stata 17.0. The model has a binary outcome care_ind and we are interested in modelling the interaction of two nominal variables care_ind_previous and child_employment_change2.
Code:
clogit care_ind /* */ i.care_ind_previous##i.child_employment_change2 b2.child_proximity_change2/* */ i.child_gender b3.child_age_cat i.child_education i.child_partner2 i.child_nchild2 /* */ , group(mergeidlevel) or vce(cluster country)
Thanking you in advance for the advice!
Comment