Dear collegues,
I'm currently working on the result of a consumers surveys. In this survey, we asked to our individuals to rank their preferred labelling scheme among a pool of ten alternatives. These labels concern seafood products.
My objective is them to analyse the consumption profiles behind the expressed preferences regarding these 10 alternatives according to our consumers characteristics.
To do so, i started by using a Mixed logit modelthrough the following command in STATA
(ID) to identify my consumers and (alternatives) my 10 schemes
Then i use:
(Rang) to dentifies the alternative ranked 1st in preferences
After, i have only case-specific variables (age, gender, place of residence, presence of children in the household....).
I don't have any random parameter in my code. I also don't have any alternative-specific variable, my labels being defined solely by their name
My question is the following : Knowing that Mixed logit are usefull to estimate random parameters, is this the best model to use for my data?
At first, i chose to use this model for two principal reasons:
- The IIA assumption
- The fact that i want to compare the preferences expressed between them.
But now, after several discussion, i'm not sure that this king of model fits the best with my data and my purpose.
I don't know if you have enough information to answer my question, but I remain available if you need me more.
Best regards,
Jean-François
I'm currently working on the result of a consumers surveys. In this survey, we asked to our individuals to rank their preferred labelling scheme among a pool of ten alternatives. These labels concern seafood products.
My objective is them to analyse the consumption profiles behind the expressed preferences regarding these 10 alternatives according to our consumers characteristics.
To do so, i started by using a Mixed logit modelthrough the following command in STATA
Code:
cmset ID alternatives
Then i use:
Code:
cmmixlogit rang, casevars(i.recode_age i.genre deplittoral prix_crit enfant univ tradi prefgeo) basealternative (10)
After, i have only case-specific variables (age, gender, place of residence, presence of children in the household....).
I don't have any random parameter in my code. I also don't have any alternative-specific variable, my labels being defined solely by their name
My question is the following : Knowing that Mixed logit are usefull to estimate random parameters, is this the best model to use for my data?
At first, i chose to use this model for two principal reasons:
- The IIA assumption
- The fact that i want to compare the preferences expressed between them.
But now, after several discussion, i'm not sure that this king of model fits the best with my data and my purpose.
I don't know if you have enough information to answer my question, but I remain available if you need me more.
Best regards,
Jean-François
Comment