Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • multiple imputation diagnostics for non-iterative methods

    Dear Statalist users,

    I am conducting multiple imputations by predictive mean matching for 3 continuous variables with a monotone missingness pattern in a multilevel dataset. Since this procedure is non-iterative, I can not use trace plots to assess the imputed values. What are conventional methods to diagnose (visually and descriptively) non-iterative multiple imputations?

    Here is the full imputation command (and the analysis model) I am using:

    Code:
    egen incrank = xtile(inc), n(100) by(country)
    gen incr_pdi = incrank * pdi
    gen incr_idv = incrank * idv
    
    mi set mlong
    mi register imputed incrank incr_pdi incr_idv
    mi register passive inc
    set seed 46352
    
    mi impute monotone (pmm, knn(5)) incr* = i.sex i.age i.educ i.empstat i.country, add(70) rseed(46352)
    
    mi estimate: mixed sa incrank i.educ i.age i.sex i.empstat pdi idv gdp gini_disp incr_pdi incr_idv || country: incrank, mle
    Thank you in advance for your help!

    Best regards,
    Daniel Rösler

  • #2
    I'm not entirely sure what some of your language above means but I think that -midiagplots- will at least get you started; use -search midiagplots- to find and install

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for answer Rich. Miadiagplots indeed looks very useful.

      To clarify, I was wondering whether for non-iterative imputations there was an alternative method to check for convergence through trace plots and auto-correlation plots or if this is not necessary in this case. Also, is it common to use non-iterative imputation methods for variables with monotone missing patterns or are there better alternatives for that?

      Comment

      Working...
      X