My apologies for the beginner question. I'm new to STATA so still learning.
My dataset looks at city level time-series on employment rate from '69 to '09. I am trying to see the effect of a minimum wage introduction in selected cities in a country. I am only using data from '74 and '75 in my evaluation.
Here is the code I tried:
I want to interpret the coefficients of my model. I have attached a picture of the output.
Would I be right in saying:
Intercept is there is 85.8% is avg employment rate in affected cities in '74.
DiD estimate of -0.2% so min wage reduced employment rate by this much.
Treatment estimate of -1.2% so min wage reduced employment rate by this much.
After estimate of +0.6% so min wage increased employment rate by this much.
I can claim that the DiD result is not statistically significant at any level. However the treatment and after results are statistically significant at a 5% level. I arrived at this conclusion because if the t-value produced is less than 0.05 then I can reject the H0 stating there is no significant effect of introducing a minimum wage policy on employment rates, and consequently I accept the H1.
My dataset looks at city level time-series on employment rate from '69 to '09. I am trying to see the effect of a minimum wage introduction in selected cities in a country. I am only using data from '74 and '75 in my evaluation.
Here is the code I tried:
Code:
clear all set more off capture log close use "C:\StateCrime.dta" tab year, gen(y) gen minwage = 0 replace minwage = 1 if cityID == 11 | cityID == 23 | cityID == 45 | cityID == 57 | cityID == 60 | cityID == 61 reg empr minwage if year==1975 gen treat = cityID == 11 | cityID == 23 | cityID == 45 | cityID == 57 | cityID == 60 | cityID == 61 gen after = year >= 1975 table treat after if year == 1974 | year == 1975, c(mean empr) gen did = treat * after reg empr did treat after if year == 1974 | year == 1975
I want to interpret the coefficients of my model. I have attached a picture of the output.
Would I be right in saying:
Intercept is there is 85.8% is avg employment rate in affected cities in '74.
DiD estimate of -0.2% so min wage reduced employment rate by this much.
Treatment estimate of -1.2% so min wage reduced employment rate by this much.
After estimate of +0.6% so min wage increased employment rate by this much.
I can claim that the DiD result is not statistically significant at any level. However the treatment and after results are statistically significant at a 5% level. I arrived at this conclusion because if the t-value produced is less than 0.05 then I can reject the H0 stating there is no significant effect of introducing a minimum wage policy on employment rates, and consequently I accept the H1.
Comment