Problems with command "etable"

[Antonio Arruebo]

Hi there,

My intention is to run "etable" to create a results table of two models.

My code is:



However, for some reason (even though I followed the instructions of the stata manual) it continues to create this unwanted table. I would like the results of the second model to be at the same row level of the first model.



I would highly appreciate some help. Thanks in advance.

Kind regards,
Antonio

[Rich Goldstein]

much of your post is unreadable on my machine, including your code and your output, so please read the FAQ and post following the advice in the FAQ

I do note that, if you are using -mi estimate- with -etable- there is currently a problem and a fix has been promised in a future update

[Antonio Arruebo]

Dear Mr. Goldstein,

I am using this code to create a results table of two binary probit models:

quietly: probit dummyWTP newsatisf prior butt bin i.age i.education i.newdistrict dummyfemale i.newincome, cluster (newdistrict)
etable

quietly: probit dummyWTH newsatisf prior butt bin i.age i.education i.newdistrict dummyfemale i.newincome, cluster (newdistrict)

etable, append mstat(N) mstat(r2_a) column(command) showstars showstarsnote cstat(_r_b) title (Binary Probit Models)

Here you can observe a table that mimics what happens when I run "etable".

	Model 1	Model 2
Explanatory var 1	0.001
Explanatory var 2	0.002
Explanatory var 3	0.003
Intercept	0.560
Explanatory var 1		0.004
Explanatory var 2		0.006
Explanatory var 3		0.008
Intercept		0.660

The problem is that the command "etable" includes the second model results below the first one, and not at the same level so results can be compared. Any idea what is going on? I followed the instruction of the Stata manual.

Thanks,

Antonio

[Enrique Pinzon (StataCorp)]

Hi Antonio,

This thread might help

https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...date-for-v17-0

[Antonio Arruebo]

Thanks a lot Mr.Pinzon! Problem solved. Cheers!