Hello,
If someone could help me with interpreting the output of group based trajectory analysis in Stata
The outout reads as follows:
. traj, var(stability*) indep(year*) model(cnorm) order(3 0 0 0) min(0) max(4) //
==== traj stata plugin ==== Jones BL Nagin DS, build: Mar 17 2021
901 observations read.
901 observations used in the trajectory model.
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Model: Censored Normal (cnorm)
Standard T for H0:
Group Parameter Estimate Error Parameter=0 Prob > T
1 Intercept 1.87518 6682.47446 0.000 0.9998
3 Intercept 5.06939 0.12004 42.231 0.0000
4 Intercept 13.20601 44.31632 0.298 0.7657
Sigma 1.66693 0.02857 58.350 0.0000
Group membership
1 (%) 27.26919 2.03163 13.422 0.0000
2 (%) 15.38789 2.26282 6.800 0.0000
3 (%) 21.99592 2.47955 8.871 0.0000
4 (%) 35.34700 1.71763 20.579 0.0000
BIC= -6702.83 (N=7311) BIC= -6691.32 (N=901) AIC= -6664.90 ll= -6653.90
As you can note in the syntex, I designated the first group to have a parameter of Cubic, and the result was only significant (p=0.0014) in cubic and then quadratic.
Is it OK that the significance is lower than 0.1 or 0.05 only in Cubic when intercept, and linear were not in the first group? since I designated the group to be Cubic?
Moreover, if only the fourth group were statistically significant (when now is not) this trajectory group will be statistically significant overall?
If someone could help me with interpreting the output of group based trajectory analysis in Stata
The outout reads as follows:
. traj, var(stability*) indep(year*) model(cnorm) order(3 0 0 0) min(0) max(4) //
==== traj stata plugin ==== Jones BL Nagin DS, build: Mar 17 2021
901 observations read.
901 observations used in the trajectory model.
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Model: Censored Normal (cnorm)
Standard T for H0:
Group Parameter Estimate Error Parameter=0 Prob > T
1 Intercept 1.87518 6682.47446 0.000 0.9998
Linear -9.96981 10.61092 -0.940 0.3475
Quadratic 0.00986 0.00516 1.912 0.0560
Cubic -0.00000 0.00000 -3.196 0.00142 Intercept 3.58373 0.17708 20.238 0.0000
3 Intercept 5.06939 0.12004 42.231 0.0000
4 Intercept 13.20601 44.31632 0.298 0.7657
Sigma 1.66693 0.02857 58.350 0.0000
Group membership
1 (%) 27.26919 2.03163 13.422 0.0000
2 (%) 15.38789 2.26282 6.800 0.0000
3 (%) 21.99592 2.47955 8.871 0.0000
4 (%) 35.34700 1.71763 20.579 0.0000
BIC= -6702.83 (N=7311) BIC= -6691.32 (N=901) AIC= -6664.90 ll= -6653.90
As you can note in the syntex, I designated the first group to have a parameter of Cubic, and the result was only significant (p=0.0014) in cubic and then quadratic.
Is it OK that the significance is lower than 0.1 or 0.05 only in Cubic when intercept, and linear were not in the first group? since I designated the group to be Cubic?
Moreover, if only the fourth group were statistically significant (when now is not) this trajectory group will be statistically significant overall?

Comment