You are not logged in. You can browse but not post. Login or Register by clicking 'Login or Register' at the top-right of this page. For more information on Statalist, see the FAQ.
You posted the same question here, to which I have replied.
Regards
--------------------------------------------------
Attaullah Shah, PhD.
Professor of Finance, Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar, Pakistan FinTechProfessor.com https://asdocx.com
Check out my asdoc program, which sends outputs to MS Word.
For more flexibility, consider using asdocx which can send Stata outputs to MS Word, Excel, LaTeX, or HTML.
Thank you for your detailed post and the time you’ve taken to benchmark the performance of various options. Your insights are valuable to us and the community. My reply is late but I saw the post today when Huong tagged me in his post.
I would like to clarify that asreg was primarily designed to write its output to the dataset, rather than creating matrices. The additional code you used, and the fact that asreg creates additional variables in the datasets and writes to them, seem to have increased the timing, (my guess).
While your matrix-based solution offers speed advantages in the specific scenario you tested, it’s important to remember that asreg was designed with a broader set of use-cases in mind. It aims to provide a balance between performance and flexibility, allowing for a wide range of covariates without the need to manually specify them.
Regards
--------------------------------------------------
Attaullah Shah, PhD.
Professor of Finance, Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar, Pakistan FinTechProfessor.com https://asdocx.com
Check out my asdoc program, which sends outputs to MS Word.
For more flexibility, consider using asdocx which can send Stata outputs to MS Word, Excel, LaTeX, or HTML.
Comment