Problem with summary statistics without "," or "."

[Salvatore Greco]

Good Morning everybody,
I have a problem: importing data from an excel sheet to Stata will convert the variable to a string. To be clear: I use commas "," for thousands, and "." for decimals on excel. To convert string variables into numeric ones I use the following code

destring assets2010, replace ignore(",")

After using this code all the numbers are without any ",", as you can see.

assets2010
4387459
1028048
655685
1011944
432152
507172
1552966
93974
2252309
983583
1826432

The problem is that when I run a simple regress or calculate some summary statistics as mean then I have numbers without "," or any kind of signs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  assets2010 | Coefficient  Std. err.      t    P>|t|     [95% conf. interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    roaa2018 |   627404.9    3283442     0.19   0.849     -5871967     7126776
       _cons |    5258159    3074135     1.71   0.090    -826901.9    1.13e+07
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PS. the regress is just an example.
Is there a way to have commas displayed in the summary statics of the regress functions (for instance for the coefficients)?
I have another question: as you can see below

assets2010
392096
338992
603169
7259209
302621
500435
1066255
550826
2288256
428394

237235
3.330e+08
258911
1352623
1739526
618400

One of the numbers is with exponential formatting and for confidence interval, this kind of formatting is again displayed. Is there a way to make it with the same format as the others?
I know it can be an outsider but I still need some time to get familiar with data analysis.
Thanks a lot to everybody for helping me.
Regards

[Rich Goldstein]

h cformat

which will let you, e.g., "set cformat %9.2fc"

[Clyde Schechter]

If you run -format assets2010 %12.0fc-, the data will be displayed with commas separating 3-digit groups when you -list-, -display-, or -browse- the data.

To get similar formatting in the regression output is harder because a) the coefficients are usually not integers, so room is needed for the decimal places, and b) the -set cformat- command does not allow formats with a total width greater than 9, which often means there isn't enough room for all of the result, the decimal places, and the commas. But when the results can accommodate all of that -set cformat %9.1fc-, run before the regression command, will do the job.

Added: Crossed with #2.

[Salvatore Greco]

Thanks a lot for the help. Wish you the best.
Regards