Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Margins when not using all interactions with subsamples from categorical variable

    Hi!

    I cannot get the margins command to work at the specific regressions that I am trying to interpret. I'm using Stata 17.

    I'm exploring a model with electoral outcomes as the dependent variable (inc_sup) for men and women in different categories of work (different industries). I have significant interactions between gender and one of the categories in the variable work. There are also theoretical reasons to include interaction with some of the industries. I therefore only interacted a subset of the categories with gender. I kept the other categories without interaction. I have also added a binary variable for region (state). So far so good. The regression output provides satisfying results.
    Code:

    Code:
     reg  inc_sup i.sex##i(2 3 9).work i(1 4 5 6 7 8).work  c.income##c.income i.state
    However, when I now try to use margins to ease interpretation I can't make it work, and instead only get not estimable outputs.

    Why is that? And what could be done to overcome the problem? All help is greatly appreciated.

    Code:
          Source |       SS           df       MS      Number of obs   =    3,526
    -------------+----------------------------------   F(15, 3510)     =    131.23
           Model |  558.754934        15  37.2503289   Prob > F        =    0.0000
        Residual |  996.301832     3,510  .283846676   R-squared       =    0.3593
    -------------+----------------------------------   Adj R-squared   =    0.3566
           Total |  1555.05677     3,525  .441150856   Root MSE        =    .53277
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              inc_sup | Coefficient  Std. err.      t    P>|t|     [95% conf. interval]
    ------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
                1.sex |  -.6713489   .0229698   -29.23   0.000    -.7163843   -.6263135
                      |
                 work |
          Industry 1  |  -.0557566   .0527001    -1.06   0.290    -.1590825    .0475694
          Industry 2  |   .1029184   .0532589     1.93   0.053    -.0015031      .20734
          Industry 3  |   .3283913   .0383965     8.55   0.000     .2531095    .4036731
          Industry 4  |   .1668998   .0390707     4.27   0.000     .0902962    .2435033
          Industry 6  |   .0594821   .0380795     1.56   0.118     -.015178    .1341422
          Industry 7  |   .3334208   .0390263     8.54   0.000     .2569043    .4099372
          Industry 8  |   .1202785     .03824     3.15   0.002     .0453037    .1952534
          Industry 9  |   .3157184   .0525634     6.01   0.000     .2126605    .4187763
                      |
             sex#work |
        1#Industry 1  |   .0724496   .0594337     1.22   0.223    -.0440785    .1889778
        1#Industry 2  |  -.0136424      .0596    -0.23   0.819    -.1304965    .1032117
        1#Industry 9  |   -.344365   .0594324    -5.79   0.000    -.4608906   -.2278395
                      |
               income |   .0257586   .0033238     7.75   0.000     .0192419    .0322754
                      |
    c.income#c.income |   -.000686   .0000902    -7.60   0.000    -.0008629   -.0005091
                      |
              1.state |   .0023146   .0198355     0.12   0.907    -.0365757    .0412049
                _cons |   4.978542   .0436143   114.15   0.000      4.89303    5.064054
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Code:
                
        Delta-method
        dy/dx   std. err.      t    P>t    [95% conf. interval]
                
    1.sex    .  (not estimable)
    
    work
    Industry 1    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 2    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 3    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 4    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 6    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 7    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 8    .  (not estimable)
    Industry 9    .  (not estimable)
    
    income    .002162   .0009772     2.21    0.027    .000246     .004078
    1.state    .  (not estimable)
                
    Note: dy/dx for    factor levels is the discrete    change from    the base level.
    I would like to explore the marginal effects of the interaction between sex and industry 1,2 and 9. How do I do that, suing margins?

    Best
    Last edited by David Isaksson; 30 May 2022, 08:36.

  • #2
    I would check out this post here

    Code:
    margins, noestimcheck

    Comment

    Working...
    X