Hi,
I am running fixed effects models across four subsamples. The subsamples are four different countries. My independent variable measures food security (1. High food secure, 2. Moderately food secure, 3. Low food secure). I would like to test which coefficients are statistically different across models. I’ve run the following model:
I think these results mean that we reject the null that the coefficients for all foodcat and country combinations are jointly equal to zero. But I do not think these answer the question of whether (and which country/s) the coefficient of foodcat2 differ across my models (i.e. which ones are statistically significant and which are not).
(I know my within R sq is low, but I am just concerned with testing significance of coefficients across models).
I am running fixed effects models across four subsamples. The subsamples are four different countries. My independent variable measures food security (1. High food secure, 2. Moderately food secure, 3. Low food secure). I would like to test which coefficients are statistically different across models. I’ve run the following model:
Code:
xtreg WB i.foodcat2##i.country, fe
note: 504.country omitted because of collinearity
note: 788.country omitted because of collinearity
note: 818.country omitted because of collinearity
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 16,511
Group variable: Findid Number of groups = 6,454
R-sq: Obs per group:
within = 0.0160 min = 2
between = 0.0600 avg = 2.6
overall = 0.0423 max = 4
F(8,10049) = 20.46
corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.0717 Prob > F = 0.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WB | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
foodcat2 |
Mod | .442859 .1088893 4.07 0.000 .2294143 .6563038
Low | .5037213 .1274802 3.95 0.000 .2538347 .753608
|
country |
Morocco | 0 (omitted)
Tunisia | 0 (omitted)
Egypt | 0 (omitted)
|
foodcat2#country |
Mod#Morocco | .1495675 .1284013 1.16 0.244 -.1021248 .4012599
Mod#Tunisia | -.276361 .132398 -2.09 0.037 -.5358876 -.0168345
Mod#Egypt | -.2140328 .1665799 -1.28 0.199 -.5405628 .1124972
Low#Morocco | .3593088 .1499573 2.40 0.017 .0653625 .653255
Low#Tunisia | -.1939231 .1521641 -1.27 0.203 -.4921952 .104349
Low#Egypt | -.1114142 .194939 -0.57 0.568 -.4935336 .2707051
|
_cons | -.3294008 .0363028 -9.07 0.000 -.4005615 -.2582401
-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 1.2589113
sigma_e | 1.3446639
rho | .46709923 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F test that all u_i=0: F(6453, 10049) = 2.06 Prob > F = 0.0000
. testparm i.foodcat2##i.country
( 1) 1.foodcat2 = 0
( 2) 2.foodcat2 = 0
( 3) 1.foodcat2#504.country = 0
( 4) 1.foodcat2#788.country = 0
( 5) 1.foodcat2#818.country = 0
( 6) 2.foodcat2#504.country = 0
( 7) 2.foodcat2#788.country = 0
( 8) 2.foodcat2#818.country = 0
F( 8, 10049) = 20.46
Prob > F = 0.0000
(I know my within R sq is low, but I am just concerned with testing significance of coefficients across models).

Comment