Hello everyone,
I am running a model using IV methods and wanted to report first stage F-stats, and since I do not make the i.i.d. assumption, I cannot use the Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic, and use Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F Statistic. I know that the critical values for this are between 5.53 and 16.38. Thus is my understanding right if I infer from the results below that I have a weak instrument problem?
Thanks!
I am running a model using IV methods and wanted to report first stage F-stats, and since I do not make the i.i.d. assumption, I cannot use the Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic, and use Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F Statistic. I know that the critical values for this are between 5.53 and 16.38. Thus is my understanding right if I infer from the results below that I have a weak instrument problem?
Code:
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 2.760 (Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 2.859 Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93 15% maximal IV size 11.59 20% maximal IV size 8.75 25% maximal IV size 7.25 Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission. NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Comment