You are not logged in. You can browse but not post. Login or Register by clicking 'Login or Register' at the top-right of this page. For more information on Statalist, see the FAQ.
It looks like a scatterplot rather than a histogram to me! Have you looked at help axis_scale_options, in particular the suboptions to use a logarithmic scale? Or am I missing something?
You're right, it looks like a scatterplot. I got the idea for this plot from:
Healy, K., and J. Moody. 2014. "Data Visualization in Sociology." Annual Review of Sociology 40:105-128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551
They write:
"Many of the distributions typically studied in sociology are extremely skewed and difficult to display as simple histograms. ... Figure 7a presents a standard histogram [as in -histogram x, percentage discrete-], whereas Figure 7b follows the convention now common in the physical sciences of presenting the distribution on a log-log scale. ... a log-log histogram is much better at revealing details in the 'long tail' of the distribution."
Given that Healy and Moody describe the log-log histogram as a common convention, I was hoping that this was available as a default in Stata which I just happened to have overlooked.
Thanks for the article reference. Some interesting stuff in it. Sorry if I wasn't clear in my message. It wasn't simply a pedantic point about what to call that type of graph that I was trying to make. Rather, I was suggesting that you could draw a graph of the format that you show straightforwardly in Stata using a graph twoway scatter combined with suboptions to place both x-axis and y-axis on a log scale. That's pretty close to a "default" to me.
My strong impression is that this graph (evidently bin frequency or probability vs value, both scales logarithmic) is not nearly so common in physical science as a plot of the reverse cumulative frequency or probability distribution with logarithmic x axis for value and logarithmic y axis for pr(X >= x) or #(X >= x). distplot from SJ is one possibility for such graphs.
Comment