I've been exploring Stata 17's new collect suite of commands for publication-quality tables. It is cleverly designed in many ways and a long-overdue enhancement. But it seems to me there are some surprising limitations, particularly around what I'll call table "prefixes" and "suffixes" for lack of better terminology. For example, there doesn't seem to be a straightforward way to create table titles or notes. By contrast, Ben Jann's excellent estout command allows for customized headers and footers, which is very helpful when creating LaTeX output (e.g., if one wants to use threeparttable or make other formatting changes). In other words, collect seems really strong for the meat of the table, but may have forgotten the bread. Am I missing something?
In concept, it would probably be easy enough to write a wrapper command for collect to address these limitations, but then again it might not be straightforward because collect doesn't allow for appending of exported files (again, unlike estout).
Any thoughts would be appreciated, as it seems to me that these limitations might slow the adoption of a potentially very useful system.
In concept, it would probably be easy enough to write a wrapper command for collect to address these limitations, but then again it might not be straightforward because collect doesn't allow for appending of exported files (again, unlike estout).
Any thoughts would be appreciated, as it seems to me that these limitations might slow the adoption of a potentially very useful system.
Comment