I need some input as to whether my understanding of pweight is correct.
Suppose there are two categories of observations with different chances of being included in the sample:
so the pweight for the first category would be n1/N, and for the second category it would be n2/N.
suppose n1 is smaller than n2, and therefore n1/N would be smaller than n2/N.
My confusion starts right at this point. Since pweight is supposed to be the inverse of the ni/N, do I need to make that calculation and
define the pweight as 1/(n1/N) for the first category and 1/(n2/N) for the second category, or do I need to leave it as (n1/N) for the
first category and (n2/N) for the second category? I guess what I am not sure about is whether Stata incorporates the inverse of ni/N automatically or it expects the user to
provide that calculation.
Suppose there are two categories of observations with different chances of being included in the sample:
so the pweight for the first category would be n1/N, and for the second category it would be n2/N.
suppose n1 is smaller than n2, and therefore n1/N would be smaller than n2/N.
My confusion starts right at this point. Since pweight is supposed to be the inverse of the ni/N, do I need to make that calculation and
define the pweight as 1/(n1/N) for the first category and 1/(n2/N) for the second category, or do I need to leave it as (n1/N) for the
first category and (n2/N) for the second category? I guess what I am not sure about is whether Stata incorporates the inverse of ni/N automatically or it expects the user to
provide that calculation.
Comment