Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pathways / event history

    Dear Statalist users

    I am hoping you can solve a query I have

    I want to look at pathways for young people aged between 15 and 30 in and out of various activities: Employment, FT; Employment PT; Unemployment; Not in the labour force; Home-making and study; and Study-only. I want to make comparisons between young people pre-Global Financial Crisis and young people post-Global Financial Crisis as well as comparisons between men and women. I'm thinking event-history analysis but I'm not quite sure how to go about it? I want to look at pathways (movements between the various activities) and maybe (although not necessarily) how long they stayed in the activities before moving.

    If event history is indeed the right way to go about it - how would I make the required time duration variables?

    I have longitudinal panel data spanning from 2001-2017.

    Can anyone assist?

    Code:
    * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex
    clear
    input float(activity GFC) byte sex
     3 0 2
    10 0 2
    10 0 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
     5 1 2
     5 1 2
    12 1 2
    12 1 2
     3 1 2
     1 1 2
     1 1 2
     1 0 2
     3 1 2
    11 1 2
     1 1 2
    10 1 2
    11 1 2
     3 1 2
    11 1 2
     3 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 0 2
    10 0 2
     7 0 2
    10 0 2
    11 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 0 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
    12 1 2
    12 1 2
    12 1 2
    12 1 2
     5 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 0 2
    11 0 2
    12 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
     3 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
    10 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 2
     3 1 1
     3 1 1
     3 1 1
     3 1 1
     3 1 1
     1 0 1
     3 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     1 0 1
     5 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
    11 1 1
    11 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
     1 1 1
    end
    label values activity activity
    label def activity 1 "[1] Employed, full-time", modify
    label def activity 3 "[3] Employed, part-time", modify
    label def activity 5 "[5] Unemployed", modify
    label def activity 7 "[7] Not in the labour force", modify
    label def activity 10 "[10] Home-making / caring", modify
    label def activity 11 "[11] Work and study", modify
    label def activity 12 "[12] Study", modify
    label values sex QSEX
    label def QSEX 1 "[1] Male", modify
    label def QSEX 2 "[2] Female", modify
    best
    Brendan

  • #2
    This sounds more like a sequence analysis: https://www.stata-journal.com/articl...article=st0111
    ---------------------------------
    Maarten L. Buis
    University of Konstanz
    Department of history and sociology
    box 40
    78457 Konstanz
    Germany
    http://www.maartenbuis.nl
    ---------------------------------

    Comment

    Working...
    X