Hi All,
Have a dataset I am wishing to apply a linear mixed model to and have some questions hopefully the community can help with
Data:
I then reshape the data to long format
reshape long y, i(id) j(time)
And apply the model
mixed y i.group##i.time || id:, covariance(unstructured) var

Then run a contrast command to assess treatment at each of the 5 time points
contrast group##time, effect
My question is on the interpretation of the STATA output:
2. In the study from which the figure above originates, the methods section of the paper states:

They have used time and group as fixed effects, study ID as a random effect and an interaction between time*group in the model. Based on the data above it seems I have an identical format to what this paper has used, would this be a correct interpretation based on the information available?
Many thanks and eagerly awaiting peoples reply.
Regards, Damian
Have a dataset I am wishing to apply a linear mixed model to and have some questions hopefully the community can help with

Data:
- Dependent (Y) variable: 10 point scale (0-10)
- Independent (X) variables: Group (0 control/1 intervention)
- Repeated measures on same individual across 5 time points (y1-y5) since intervention.
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input byte(id y1 y2 y3 y4 y5 group) 1 6 . . . 2 0 2 6 8 . . . 0 3 0 . . . . 0 4 0 2 2 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 . . . 4 0 7 3 . . . 0 0 8 . . . 4 4 0 9 3 4 . 2 4 0 10 2 6 6 4 6 0 11 4 4 4 . 0 0 12 . . 8 8 8 0 13 2 . . 1 5 0 14 . . . 0 5 0 15 3 2 . 2 . 0 16 0 0 0 . 0 0 17 0 2 0 4 5 0 18 . 3 3 3 2 0 19 0 0 0 8 5 0 20 7 3 4 5 2 0 21 5 10 7 6 5 0 22 8 6 5 2 . 0 23 0 8 6 6 6 0 24 4 5 . 3 0 0 25 . 2 2 1 1 0 26 4 0 0 0 . 0 27 2 3 0 1 1 0 28 5 . 4 3 . 0 29 0 0 . . . 0 30 0 6 4 4 4 0 31 9 7 7 7 5 0 32 3 2 0 . 0 1 33 . . . . 2 1 34 5 4 . . . 1 35 0 0 0 0 2 1 36 2 1 0 1 1 1 37 . . . 4 3 1 38 . . 4 4 5 1 39 . 2 2 . 0 1 41 . 5 5 4 3 1 42 . . . . . 1 43 4 2 2 3 3 1 44 0 0 0 2 0 1 45 3 2 3 0 2 1 46 . 0 0 0 . 1 47 2 0 2 . 1 1 48 0 3 2 2 3 1 49 0 3 3 . . 1 50 . 5 4 3 3 1 51 5 5 5 5 5 1 52 0 . 0 0 0 1 53 5 . 10 7 8 1 54 . 0 0 0 . 1 55 . 0 1 1 5 1 56 2 2 0 . 2 1 57 6 6 5 5 . 1 end
I then reshape the data to long format
reshape long y, i(id) j(time)
And apply the model
mixed y i.group##i.time || id:, covariance(unstructured) var
Then run a contrast command to assess treatment at each of the 5 time points
contrast group##time, effect
My question is on the interpretation of the STATA output:
- Many papers produce box plots for two groups across multiple time points and state a ‘group time interaction effect’ as the final quoted result (see below, p=0.38). Does my study value indicated by red arrow above (p=0.7685) correspond to what the paper below mentions as their ‘group time interaction effect’?
2. In the study from which the figure above originates, the methods section of the paper states:
They have used time and group as fixed effects, study ID as a random effect and an interaction between time*group in the model. Based on the data above it seems I have an identical format to what this paper has used, would this be a correct interpretation based on the information available?
Many thanks and eagerly awaiting peoples reply.
Regards, Damian
Comment