Dear Experts,
"fresh on board".
I have an unbalanced panel data of all NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ firms from 1998 to 2018. After doing the F-test, Hausman test, the results suggest me to use Fixed Effects.
However, most of my main explanatory variables get the wrong sign (I expect a + sign, but it is a - sign) and are not statistically significant; whereas the coefficients from using the Pooled OLS and Random Effects have the correct sign and are statistically significant.
My questions are:
Thanks in advance.
Neng
"fresh on board".
I have an unbalanced panel data of all NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ firms from 1998 to 2018. After doing the F-test, Hausman test, the results suggest me to use Fixed Effects.
However, most of my main explanatory variables get the wrong sign (I expect a + sign, but it is a - sign) and are not statistically significant; whereas the coefficients from using the Pooled OLS and Random Effects have the correct sign and are statistically significant.
My questions are:
- what should I do next in ur opinion?
- I expect to have a sub-period analysis. (maybe the above issue is due to a structural break?) I have checked many previous topics about testing unstructured breaks in panel data, but could not find a direct answer. How can I test an unknown structural break in panel data?
- BTW, I got negative chi-square in some of the Hausman tests.
Thanks in advance.
Neng
Comment