Hello,
I have a quick question regarding the -margins- after the -cmp- command. I am running a simultaneous equations (ordered probit) model but I cannot get the margins. There are two equations (one for PKG and the other for Trip) in my code. My model looks like this:
I got the model result and it looks okay.
Mixed-process regression
Number of obs = 2,160, Wald chi2(21) = 3582.08
Log pseudolikelihood = -3401.4193 , Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
.
HOWEVER, -margins- does not work well for the second equation. This is the margins for the second question. All values are zeroes.
margins, dydx(*) predict(eq(#2) pr outcome(#1))
.
For the first equation, it works well for every outcome. For instance,
margins, dydx(*) predict(eq(#1) pr outcome(#1))
.
Why am I getting all "zero"s in the marginal effects for the second equation?
I would really appreciate your help.
Sincerely,
I have a quick question regarding the -margins- after the -cmp- command. I am running a simultaneous equations (ordered probit) model but I cannot get the margins. There are two equations (one for PKG and the other for Trip) in my code. My model looks like this:
Code:
cmp (PKG= Age Race_A Race_B Race_H Race_O Smartphone Income_25 Income_50 Income_75 Income_100 Child_1 Child_2) (Trip = PKG# Age Race_A Race_B Race_H Race_O Car_1 Car_2 Emp_Ft Weekend ) [pweight=allwt], indicators($cmp_oprobit $cmp_oprobit )
Mixed-process regression
Number of obs = 2,160, Wald chi2(21) = 3582.08
Log pseudolikelihood = -3401.4193 , Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
Coef. | Std. Err. | z | P>z | [95% Conf. | Interval] | |
PKG | ||||||
Age | -0.00818 | 0.002182 | -3.75 | 0 | -0.01246 | -0.00391 |
Race_A | 0.003987 | 0.103061 | 0.04 | 0.969 | -0.19801 | 0.205983 |
Race_B | -0.2102 | 0.084909 | -2.48 | 0.013 | -0.37662 | -0.04378 |
Race_H | -0.08357 | 0.084729 | -0.99 | 0.324 | -0.24964 | 0.082497 |
Race_O | -0.51918 | 0.213183 | -2.44 | 0.015 | -0.93701 | -0.10135 |
Smartphone | 0.530897 | 0.10361 | 5.12 | 0 | 0.327825 | 0.733969 |
Income_25 | 0.163087 | 0.104023 | 1.57 | 0.117 | -0.04079 | 0.366968 |
Income_50 | 0.393381 | 0.103228 | 3.81 | 0 | 0.191058 | 0.595705 |
Income_75 | 0.545501 | 0.112677 | 4.84 | 0 | 0.324659 | 0.766344 |
Income_100 | 0.757234 | 0.110492 | 6.85 | 0 | 0.540674 | 0.973795 |
Child_1 | 0.090436 | 0.078244 | 1.16 | 0.248 | -0.06292 | 0.243791 |
Child_2 | 0.167188 | 0.079285 | 2.11 | 0.035 | 0.011792 | 0.322584 |
Trip | ||||||
PKG# | 0.44458 | 0.170289 | 2.61 | 0.009 | 0.11082 | 0.778341 |
Age | 0.011561 | 0.004005 | 2.89 | 0.004 | 0.003712 | 0.01941 |
Race_A | -0.36778 | 0.245455 | -1.5 | 0.134 | -0.84886 | 0.113305 |
Race_B | 0.280395 | 0.188232 | 1.49 | 0.136 | -0.08853 | 0.649323 |
Race_H | 0.146785 | 0.16831 | 0.87 | 0.383 | -0.1831 | 0.476667 |
Race_O | -4.02057 | 0.677218 | -5.94 | 0 | -5.34789 | -2.69325 |
Car_1 | 4.268134 | 0.341488 | 12.5 | 0 | 3.598829 | 4.937439 |
Car_2 | 4.430902 | 0.331977 | 13.35 | 0 | 3.780238 | 5.081566 |
Emp_Ft | -0.27855 | 0.121284 | -2.3 | 0.022 | -0.51626 | -0.04084 |
Weekend | 0.192648 | 0.134175 | 1.44 | 0.151 | -0.07033 | 0.455626 |
/cut_1_1 | -0.12556 | 0.166133 | -0.76 | 0.45 | -0.45117 | 0.200054 |
/cut_1_2 | 0.298658 | 0.163662 | 1.82 | 0.068 | -0.02211 | 0.61943 |
/cut_1_3 | 1.25663 | 0.167456 | 7.5 | 0 | 0.928422 | 1.584838 |
/cut_1_4 | 1.628837 | 0.165322 | 9.85 | 0 | 1.304812 | 1.952862 |
/cut_2_1 | 6.616011 | 0.130187 | 50.82 | 0 | 6.360849 | 6.871174 |
/atanhrho_12 | -0.64896 | 0.236971 | -2.74 | 0.006 | -1.11341 | -0.1845 |
rho_12 | -0.57097 | 0.159717 | -0.80527 | -0.18244 |
HOWEVER, -margins- does not work well for the second equation. This is the margins for the second question. All values are zeroes.
margins, dydx(*) predict(eq(#2) pr outcome(#1))
dy/dx | Std. Err. | z | P>z | [95% Conf. | Interval] | |
Age | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Race_A | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Race_B | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Race_H | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Race_O | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Smartphone | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Income_25 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Income_50 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Income_75 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Income_100 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Child_1 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Child_2 | 0 | (omitted) |
For the first equation, it works well for every outcome. For instance,
margins, dydx(*) predict(eq(#1) pr outcome(#1))
dy/dx | Std. Err. | z | P>z | [95% Conf. | Interval] | |
Age | 0.002593 | 0.00068 | 3.81 | 0 | 0.00126 | 0.003926 |
Race_A | -0.00126 | 0.032646 | -0.04 | 0.969 | -0.06525 | 0.062721 |
Race_B | 0.066584 | 0.026922 | 2.47 | 0.013 | 0.013818 | 0.119351 |
Race_H | 0.026472 | 0.026851 | 0.99 | 0.324 | -0.02615 | 0.079098 |
Race_O | 0.16446 | 0.067394 | 2.44 | 0.015 | 0.03237 | 0.296549 |
Smartphone | -0.16817 | 0.032171 | -5.23 | 0 | -0.23123 | -0.10512 |
Income_25 | -0.05166 | 0.03294 | -1.57 | 0.117 | -0.11622 | 0.012899 |
Income_50 | -0.12461 | 0.032573 | -3.83 | 0 | -0.18845 | -0.06077 |
Income_75 | -0.1728 | 0.035361 | -4.89 | 0 | -0.2421 | -0.10349 |
Income_100 | -0.23987 | 0.034391 | -6.97 | 0 | -0.30727 | -0.17246 |
Child_1 | -0.02865 | 0.024763 | -1.16 | 0.247 | -0.07718 | 0.019888 |
Child_2 | -0.05296 | 0.025014 | -2.12 | 0.034 | -0.10199 | -0.00393 |
Car_1 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Car_2 | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Emp_Ft | 0 | (omitted) | ||||
Weekend | 0 | (omitted) |
Why am I getting all "zero"s in the marginal effects for the second equation?
I would really appreciate your help.
Sincerely,
Comment