Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fixed, Random or Pool OLS.

    Hi, I have panel data containing firm observations for two years.

    I have to choose Panel model among fixed (FEM), random (REM) and pool OLS.
    Results confirm my hypothesis in all models (FEM, REM and OLS), but I don’t know which result I have to report in my paper.
    I used ​​Hausam test, BPLM, and Chow test.
    I used ​​​​​​Hausam test: for choose random effect or fixed effect.
    Since th​​e chi2(12) = 0.01; Prob > chibar2 = 1.0000
    P-value=1.000, I cannot reject the Null.
    Random effect model is more appropriate
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Hausman.png
Views:	1
Size:	517.3 KB
ID:	1537293

    I used Breusch-Pagan Lagrange multiplier (LM): for choose Random effects or OLS.
    Since th​​e chibar2(01) = 0.00; Prob > chibar2 = 1.0000
    P-value is 1, we failed to reject the null, and conclude simple OLS regression is appropriate.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Breush.png
Views:	1
Size:	219.2 KB
ID:	1537294


    I used Chow test: for choose Fixed or Pooling OLS effect.
    The result comes from the fixed effect panel model.
    Since F(1, 202) = 0.01; Prob > F = 0.9299
    Prob>F is bigger than 0.05.
    Since the null is not rejected, I choose the Fixed effect model.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Chow.png
Views:	1
Size:	555.4 KB
ID:	1537295

    The three tests don’t give a univoque solution.
    How can I solve?
    Tkanks
    Luigi
    Last edited by Luigi Lepore; 19 Feb 2020, 04:15.

  • #2
    Luigi:
    p-value=1 in -hausman- is suspect.
    Considering the results of the other tests, too, I think you should go pooled OLS.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (Stata 19.0)

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Carlo,
      thanks a lot.
      Could the problem be generated by the fact that the values of my dependent variable (obtained by a content analysis of firms' non-financial report) for years 2017 and 2018 are very similar for each obseration? Moreover, also the value of the principal independent variable (proportion of independent directors in the firms' board) is very stable over the two years.
      many thanks
      bye
      Luigi

      Comment


      • #4
        Luigi:
        yes, this may be the reason of what you experienced, that is a negligible within and between variation of regressand and regressors.
        If you look at -hausman- table (by the way: in your future posts please use CODE delimiters to share what you typed and what Stata gave you back. See the FAQ on this and other helpful posting-related topics. Thanks) regardless the specification of your regression model, the coefficients are basically the same.
        Kind regards,
        Carlo
        (Stata 19.0)

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you very much Carlo
          Best regards
          Luigi

          Comment

          Working...
          X