Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Beta coefficient Zero

    Dear statalisters,

    I would like to ask you please why a coefficient and its paramenters could be zero?
    In the next output, you can see coefficient with value zero for mkt and for the constant. I think is not collinearity because usally when that happens it says omitted.

    Thank you very much for any guide about it.
    best regards, Alejandro

    The command used was (in stata 15)

    Code:
    metareg  es p i m pn en eqa neq cha dex mult nfpa ac stk mkt surv tec man cper adj log fsi fag fsal rdi sla ppv pdep aim aag apex prel rda psi npa asi acop cul geo gdp tru usa cty nv ivi ind yea [w=fo], model (mm)
    HTML Code:
    Meta-Analytic Random Intercept, Fixed Slopes Regression Analysis
    
    Source             Q        df          P             No. of obs  =    985
    Mean ES = 0.0169
    Model      363.4017        46    0.00000               R-squared = 0.1973
    Residual     1478.8882       938    0.00000
    
    Total     1842.2899       984    0.00000
    
    
    Variable       Coef.   Std. Err.          z      P>z  [95% Conf. Interval]
    
    p           -.065044     .022584   -2.88006   0.003976   -.109309   -.020779
    i           -.009889     .003381   -2.92526   0.003442   -.016515   -.003263
    m            .001551     .000946    1.63816   0.101388   -.000305    .003406
    pn           .004085     .016347    .249909   0.802658   -.027955    .036126
    en           .000029     .012981    .002208   0.998238   -.025414    .025472
    eqa          -3.0753     1.89876   -1.61965   0.105307   -6.79692    .646237
    neq          -3.0625     1.89999   -1.61184   0.106998   -6.78644    .661506
    cha          -3.0349     1.89801   -1.59897   0.109828   -6.75495    .685239
    dex          -3.0353     1.89699   -1.60004   0.109590   -6.75335    .682838
    mult         -3.0545     1.89847   -1.60892   0.107633   -6.77549    .666508
    nfpa         -2.9649     1.89882   -1.56144   0.118420   -6.68657    .756796
    ac           .021129     .036228    .583216   0.559748   -.049878    .092136
    stk          .099349     .035932    2.76493   0.005693    .028923    .169776
    mkt                0           0          .          .          0          0
    surv        -.005492     .035802   -.153387   0.878093   -.075664    .064681
    tec          .051017     .037522    1.35965   0.173941   -.022526     .12456
    man           .12225     .033437    3.65606   0.000256    .056711    .187783
    cper         -.36405     .110126   -3.30574   0.000947   -.579893     -.1482
    adj           .15403     .056897    2.70716   0.006786    .042511    .265548
    log          .068147      .02593    2.62811   0.008586    .017324     .11897
    fsi          .015069     .012428    1.21246   0.225336   -.009291    .039428
    fag          .040444     .015558    2.59951   0.009336     .00995    .070938
    fsal        -.058324     .025717   -2.26787   0.023337    -.10873   -.007918
    rdi          .091974     .017304    5.31532   0.000000    .058059    .125889
    sla         -.030345      .02516   -1.20608   0.227787   -.079659    .018969
    ppv         -.000034      .02493   -.001354   0.998920   -.048896    .048829
    pdep         -.03831     .021825   -1.75535   0.079199   -.081087    .004466
    aim         -.057982     .022561   -2.57001   0.010170   -.102201   -.013762
    aag          .006862     .014614    .469535   0.638688   -.021781    .035504
    apex        -.015677     .013575   -1.15483   0.248159   -.042284     .01093
    prel         .065808     .013478    4.88259   0.000001    .039391    .092226
    rda         -.057806     .019643   -2.94284   0.003252   -.096306   -.019306
    psi         -.068684     .025796   -2.66261   0.007754   -.119245   -.018124
    npa          .033065     .018311    1.80574   0.070958   -.002825    .068954
    asi         -.069288     .017784   -3.89614   0.000098   -.104144   -.034432
    acop         .055751     .018406    3.02897   0.002454    .019675    .091826
    cul          .062433     .015462    4.03795   0.000054    .032128    .092738
    geo         -.011336     .022671   -.500025   0.617057   -.055772    .033099
    gdp          .021191     .020028     1.0581   0.290011   -.018063    .060445
    tru         -.021388     .020313   -1.05291   0.292382   -.061202    .018426
    usa          .022632     .023017    .983251   0.325484   -.022482    .067745
    cty         -.008364     .027037   -.309353   0.757053   -.061357    .044629
    nv           .000372     .000423    .880756   0.378450   -.000456    .001201
    ivi         -.006033     .014989   -.402481   0.687330    -.03541    .023345
    ind         -.074778     .012284   -6.08766   0.000000   -.098854   -.050702
    yea         -.041271     .013598   -3.03498   0.002406   -.067923   -.014618
    _cons              0           0          .          .          0          0
    
    Random effects variance component (via method of moments) =  .0118395







  • #2
    Already posted at https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...d-wilson-macro

    Please don't repeat posts. This is explained in the FAQ Advice.

    I've never used this command and am not able to answer myself.

    Anyone who can: please follow the other thread, which has a better title.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hello Nick,
      Thank you for the advice. I did it because here I just wanted to be concentrated in one question, that could be a general question related with the zero at the coefficient, but not related with the metareg, the other post was directly related to the metareg, with more questions related to the metareg and here only about the zeros. I apologize.
      Alejandro

      Comment


      • #4
        If there is a case for repeating a question under a different title, then the minimal expectation is surely that you cross-refer in each thread to the other. A better solution is a thread title which covers the important bases.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you Nick, its not going to happen again.
          Best,
          Alejandro

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks for #5.

            Comment

            Working...
            X