Dear all,
I encounter the problem with the user written command acreg or ols_spatial_HAC for spatial standard error adjustments that standard errors are not displayed for certain ranges of distance cutoffs. I use STATA 15 on Win (64-bit).
I have 500+ observations but this reduced example should show the problem:
This also happens when using ols_spatial_HAC command instead of acreg.
I am puzzled by the fact that I get a standard error for the 200km distance cutoff, but none for the 175km one.
Thank you in advance!
Sincerely,
Steven
I encounter the problem with the user written command acreg or ols_spatial_HAC for spatial standard error adjustments that standard errors are not displayed for certain ranges of distance cutoffs. I use STATA 15 on Win (64-bit).
I have 500+ observations but this reduced example should show the problem:
Code:
*My example data
clear all
input float(lon lat) byte x double y float constant
8.978752 49.15352 1 .3125 1
9.16124 47.79682 0 .230769230769231 1
8.627637 48.93355 1 .277777777777778 1
9.386187 47.71273 0 .333333333333333 1
9.283757 49.29697 1 .0952380952380952 1
7.943795 48.47777 1 .3 1
8.503139 49.29774 1 .285714285714286 1
8.572759 48.94195 1 .272727272727273 1
7.883648 48.07095 1 .227272727272727 1
8.195633 47.67924 0 .166666666666667 1
7.950767 47.96292 0 .333333333333333 1
8.760374 47.78041 1 .2 1
8.185254 48.86308 1 .234042553191489 1
8.3561125 48.71901 1 .166666666666667 1
8.644542 49.05665 1 .214285714285714 1
7.594427 47.63269 1 .5 1
8.70044 49.34214 1 .307692307692308 1
end
*now run my regression for various distance cutoff values
forvalues i=25(25) 200{
acreg y x , spatial latitude(lat) longitude(lon) distcutoff(`i')
}
*I cannot explain now why there is no se shown for 175 but one for 200 exists
*by adding the bartlett option this issue disappers
forvalues i=25(25) 200{
acreg y x , spatial latitude(lat) longitude(lon) distcutoff(`i') bartlett
}
I am puzzled by the fact that I get a standard error for the 200km distance cutoff, but none for the 175km one.
Thank you in advance!
Sincerely,
Steven

Comment