Dear community,
I am running a cross-sectional regression on the cultural distance index and firm performance. Since many researchers suggest that the relationship is more than just a simple linear relationship, I am investigating if there is a possible non-linear relationship between the two variables of interest.
After running the regression models, the coefficient on the CD index (X) and its squared term (X^2) appear to be significant at the 5% level and suggest a convex relationship.
However, after running a level-log regression model (so without the X and X^2(!)), the natural logarithm of CD (ln[X]) is also statistically significant. It should be noted that the latter coefficient on lnX is negative and significant at almost the 5% level (alpha = 6.3). Could anyone tell me how it is possible that both relationships appear to be significant and how I should interpret these results?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bas Thomas
I am running a cross-sectional regression on the cultural distance index and firm performance. Since many researchers suggest that the relationship is more than just a simple linear relationship, I am investigating if there is a possible non-linear relationship between the two variables of interest.
After running the regression models, the coefficient on the CD index (X) and its squared term (X^2) appear to be significant at the 5% level and suggest a convex relationship.
However, after running a level-log regression model (so without the X and X^2(!)), the natural logarithm of CD (ln[X]) is also statistically significant. It should be noted that the latter coefficient on lnX is negative and significant at almost the 5% level (alpha = 6.3). Could anyone tell me how it is possible that both relationships appear to be significant and how I should interpret these results?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bas Thomas
Comment