Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Panel regression

    Hello,

    I am working with panel data where T=23 and N= 22 (country).
    I performed the following steps:

    xtreg depvar indepvar (1) indepvar (2) indepvar (dummy), fe
    estimate store fe
    xtreg depvar indepvar (1) indepvar (2) indepvar (dummy), re
    estimate store fe

    To decide between the both models I run the Hausman test, whose result indicates that fixed effects is the appropriate model. (chi2 = 86.60 Prob>chi2 = 0.0000)

    After this, I applied tests to check problems of cross sectional independence (a), heteroskedasticity (b) and autocorrelation(c):

    (a): xtcsd, pesaran abs | Result: Pr = 0.7796 (There is no serial correlation)
    (b): xttest3 | Result: Prob>chi2 = 0.0000 (There is Heteroskedasticity)
    (c): xtserial | Result: Prob > F = 0.0000 (There is Autocorrelation) | I also estimated this command for each of the independent variables. xtserial depvar indepvar 1
    xtserial depvar indepvar 2 ... (always autocorrelation)

    I have problems of autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity in my model.

    So to solve these problems, according to what I read in https://www.stata.com/manuals/xtxtgls.pdf, once I have T>N, I used xtgls:
    xtgls dep indepVar's, panels (heteroskedastic) corr (ar1)

    My questions is: What I did is correct? Is the best way to fix these problems?

    Thank you.

    Best regards

  • #2
    Mary:
    your code looks fine to me.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (Stata 19.0)

    Comment


    • #3
      Carlo,
      I really appreciate your feedback. Thank you very much.

      Comment

      Working...
      X