Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Multilevel Model with Individual fixed effects

    Hi Statalisters,

    I have a panel dataset with around 30,000 individuals observed for four years all over the US. My dependent variable is a binary variable that depends on individual characteristics and state characteristics. I want to isolate the variance in my dependent variable across states while controlling for individual fixed effects. My approach has been to fit a multilevel model using the -mixed- command and -predict- to obtain the BLUP at the state level according to the following, where the individual identifier is ID and the state identifier is state:

    Code:
    mixed dependent_variable ID  || state:
    predict  blup_state , reffects
    My first question is whether this is actually the correct specification for the above stated purpose or whether I have to model the individual fixed effects also as random variables to obtain the correct variance decomposition.

    Secondly, since I have worked with a different version of stata before, which didn't allow me to specify a model using the -mixed- command with such a high number of categorical variables to control for, I have partialed out the individual fixed effects manually and used the -mixed- command with the predicted residuals according to:

    Code:
    areg dependent_variable, absorb(ID)
    predict dependent_variable_resid, resid
     
    mixed dependent_variable_resid  || state:
    predict  blup_resid_state, reffects
    However, while I expected the standard errors to be incorrect I was under the assumption that the predicted results should be the same when compared with the results of the first specified model. But it turns out they are significantly different. Hence, my second question would be whether I missed something obvious here or misspecified the model.

    Comments are greatly appreciated.

  • #2
    Considering the individuals are observed for 4 years, and they are probably nested in the State, you may think about using ID as the lower level, rathen then State. In short, we'd have a multilevel approach, with the repeated measures at the botton level, then ID, then State.
    Best regards,

    Marcos

    Comment

    Working...
    X