Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • how to predict technical efficiency after estimating a true random effcet model.

    Dear All,
    I am running a true random effcetmodel, which accounts hetroscedasticity using the sfpanel command. But I failed to find the way to predict the technical efficiency(inefficiency). The ususal command predict TE, te is not functional in this case.
    Please help me any one who can sort out this.
    Thank you!!!

  • #2
    -sfpanel- is written by F. Belotti, S. Daidone, G. Ilardi, and V. Atella https://www.stata-journal.com/articl...article=st0315
    Code:
    help sfpanel postestimation
    Then clicking on -predict- brings up:
    Code:
        statistic        Description
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Main
          xb             linear prediction; the default
          stdp           standard error of the prediction
          u              estimates of (technical or cost) inefficiency via E(u|e) (Jondrow et al., 1982)
          u0             estimates of (technical or cost) inefficiency via E(u|e) when the random effect is
                           zero; only after model(tre)
          m              estimates of (technical or cost) inefficiency via M(u|e)
          jlms           estimates of (technical or cost) efficiency via exp[-E(u|e)]
          bc             estimates of (technical or cost) efficiency via E[exp(-u)|e] (Battese and Coelli,
                           1988)
          ci             estimates of confidence interval for (technical or cost) inefficiency/efficiency
          marginal       marginal effects of the exogenous determinants on the unconditional mean and variance
                           of the inefficiency (Wang, 2002)
          trunc(tlevel)  truncation of estimated efficiency/inefficiency
          scores         calculates score variables

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you very much Scott. I got it. But I am not still clear with the difference between u, u0, and m and jlms and bc.

      Comment

      Working...
      X