Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Time-varying Covariate with Competing Risks

    Hello,

    I have to study the relationship between a drug exposure and outcomes, adjusting for other covariates.
    For each subject the drug concentration was recorded once a month as a continuous value. This concentration may vary over time.
    There are two possible competing Outcomes:
    subject Month#1 Month#2 Month#n Outcome
    1 160 240 240 0 (Censored)
    2 360 340 360 1 (Event of Interest)
    3 240 180 180 2 (Competing Event)
    I tried the stcox solution (https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/s...ate-cox-model/) but Cox treat competing events as censored.
    I would appreciate any sugestions.
    Thanks in advance !
    Last edited by Jacinto Aquino Pinto; 24 Nov 2018, 07:06.

  • #2
    It's not clear from your post what quantities you want to estimate.

    Using Cox (or other parametric regression models) to estimate cause-specific hazards/Hazard Ratios is perfectly ok. To do so, you treat the competing event times as censored. Time-varying covariates are not an issue in the interpretation of HRs (although landmarking is an alternative, see for example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711994/).

    If you want to estimate Cumulative Incidence Functions, with time-fixed covariates you can "combine" results from cause-specific hazard regression models (see for example http://data.princeton.edu/pop509/justices.html) or you can model the sub-distribution hazard of the event of interest using Fine-Gray regression models. Note that with internal/endogenous time-varying covariates things become more complicated and you need to be extra careful if you want to predict CIFs/survival functions (eg, landmarking again) (see for example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3702649/ https://academic.oup.com/biostatisti...9/4/765/259139 and references therein)

    Comment


    • #3
      Relevant and just published: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10....62280218811837

      Comment

      Working...
      X