Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fixed effects and dynamic ordinary least squares

    Dear all,

    I am currently working on a research topic related on the environmental disaggregate renewable energy effectsts.
    I am estimating some regression models with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of renewable energy diffusion on the ghg emission.


    The models are:

    Yit= B0 + B1 RES+ B2 FOSSIL+ uit


    Where: Res= share of renewable energy production; Fossil= share of fossil energy production; E= ghg emission


    I would like to know what is the differece beetween fixed effects and DOLS (dynamic ordinary least squares).
    I have 21 years and 28 countries.


    I would very much appreciate some thoughts on this problem.
    Thanks in advance!

    Matteo

  • #2
    Matteo:
    if you have (as it seems) a panel dataset and your dependent variable is continuous, you may want to consider:
    1) -xtreg, fe- for fixed effect panel data regression (however, you should not rule out a random effect specification on an a priori basis). As your T dimension is slightly smaller than the N one, you should, in all likelihood, impose -cluster- (or -robust-) standard errors to take both heteroskedasticity and (even more important) autocorrelation into account;
    2) -xtabond- for dynamic panel data regression.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (Stata 19.0)

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks Carlo Lazzaro,

      Yes I have a panel dataset and all variables are continuos. On my topic the literature use DOLS a lot, but I Idid not understand the difference between OLS and DOLS.
      I never used xtabond yet. So I know xtreg very well. What is the main differences beetwen xtreg and xtabond??

      Comment


      • #4
        Matteo:
        -xtabond- allows lagged dependent variable; as you know, a lagged dependent variable in -xtreg- makes the regression biased.
        Kind regards,
        Carlo
        (Stata 19.0)

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks Carlo Lazzaro,
          as I told you, the analyzed literature often uses the DOLS estimator (Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares for Cointegrated Panel Data) of Kao and Chiang (2000). This estimator give the long-run elasticities and it seems very interesting for my topic. However, I did not find detailed information on DOLS in Stata; indeed the authors use Eviews. This method is based on the cointegration relationship between the variables analyzed in the models.
          I found only the "xtdolshm" command on stata, but the output is different from the analyzed literature because in Stata the output give z-statistic and in Eviews t-stastic.

          Comment


          • #6
            Matteo:
            slide 20 of https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~bhansen/390/390Lecture22.pdf seems to cover (marginally) what you're interested in.
            Sorry I cannot be more helpful.
            An aside from the pedantic corner: whenever you mention a contribution, please share full reference (see the FAQ on why this is a good idea). Thanks.
            Kind regards,
            Carlo
            (Stata 19.0)

            Comment

            Working...
            X