Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • QREGPD goodness of fit

    Hi!

    I am having issues finding a measure of the goodness of fit of my results.
    I used the qregpd command and would like to estimate either the pseudo R2, the F statistic, Akaike Inforation Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, or any other indicator.
    Is there a command I can run?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    Thank you in advance.
    Lorina

  • #2
    Dear Lorina Sertio,

    Do you really need to measure goodness-of-fit? The statistics you mention often have little meaning and they have even less meaning in this context.

    Best wishes,

    Joao

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Joao,

      I am working on a project that requires I present some form of goodness of fit measure, even it doesn't necessarily say much.
      Is there something I can calculate? I will appreciate any help.

      If it is possible to calculate some measure, why wouldn’t it say much?
      I believe if that is the case, I should provide some explanation as to why the measure provides little meaning in this context.

      Thank you in advance.

      Best Regards,
      Lorina

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Lorina Sertio,

        I would need to know more about your project to be able to advise; can you give more information? More generally, having a good fit is not an assumption in any estimation method I am aware of, so a good fit or a lack of it say little about the validity of the results. For example, it is well known that the so-called spurious regressions tend to have very high R2 and there results are still meaningless.

        Best wishes,

        Joao

        Comment


        • #5
          Dear Joao,

          I am currently writing my thesis on the effects of the mobile phone on consumption for different types of Ehiopian farm households.
          Using the qregpd command, I have estimated the effects for the 15th, 50th and 85th quantile.

          How can I tell that for the chosen quantiles, the estimated model is a good fit?
          I understand that, in this context, the R2 may be meaningless but then I want to discuss those limitations in my paper.

          I would really appreciate your help.

          Thank you.

          Best regards,
          Lorina Sertio

          Comment


          • #6
            Dear Lorina,

            Thanks for this. May I ask what is the level of the thesis (undergrad, masters, PhD) and why are you using qregpd?

            The R2 is popular because in some cases it can be interpreted as the proportion of the variance of y explained by the model. When doing quantile regression that interpretation is not valid, so it is not clear what R2 could mean. One possibility is to compute the R2 as the square of the correlation between y and its fitted values (which is another interpretation of the R2) but there is no reason why that should be high.

            Best wishes,

            Joao

            Comment


            • #7
              My apologies for posting on an old topic here, but since I have landed up in a similar conundrum, I was wondering how best would I be able to estimate the model fit (in choosing between the un/constained models) in STATA. Would be grateful for the answer. Thank you.

              Just an additional info: I'm writing Master's Thesis on: Explaining Cross-Province Differentials in Child Nutritional Outcome in Nepal: An Application of Quantile Regression [Nature of analysis: Cross-sectional] [Will be running bsqreg]
              Last edited by Gopal Trital; 07 Feb 2019, 02:50.

              Comment

              Working...
              X