Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ask some questions about ''Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimation" with the command -xtpoisson-

    Dear all,

    I'm estimating the gravity model. My data is panel data. My dependent variable is trade volume. After I have read a number of literature review, especially papers of Prof Santos Silva, J.M.C. So, I decide to use PPML. I use the STATA command - xtpoisson - and add the option - fe -. And, the result is quite good since many independent variables are significant. However, I still confuse some issues as follows:

    1. Since the gravity model is generally presented in a nonlinear form and can be presented in a linear form by taking logarithm. So, do I need to check the multicollinearity problem?

    2. Since my data is panel data, contained 194 countries and 19 years, do I need to check the autocorrelation problem?

    3. I try to add the option vce(robust) in the STATA command -xtpoisson dependent var independent var, fe -. However, I found that the standard error is larger. As far as I know, after correcting SE, the SE should be smaller. So, should I add the option - vce(robust) after -xtpoisson dependent var independent var, fe ?

    4. I try to use RESET test following some guidance presented at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/tenreyro/lgw.html. However, if I don't correct SE, the result always shows that the model is not appropriate (Reject H0). And, if I correct SE, the result shows that the model is appropriate. However, as I mention in the number 3, SE become larger after using the option vce(robust). So, do I need to test for model specification by using RESET test. And are there any test that can I use instead of RESET test?

    5. If I want to compare the result performance of PPML and Negative Binomial PML, how can I do that? Can I use "hpc test"? Or, are there any test can do that?

    Many thanks in advance

    Regards
    BT

Working...
X