Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • understanding difficulties

    Hello,
    I am a new STATA user and I have tried to anyalyze my data using fixed effect (within) IV regression.

    xtivreg yieldkg age edu experience (soiltest = information),fe
    here,
    yieldkg is my dependent variable

    soiltest is treatment variable and information is IV.

    But after seeing the results, I am unable to figure out why the value of “age, edu and experience" is zero.

    I will be really grateful if anyone kindly explain to me about this problem.

    Thank you very much in advance.

    Sincerely,
    Faruque.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2018-05-04 at 3.48.38 PM.png
Views:	1
Size:	43.1 KB
ID:	1442912




    0
    multiple choice
    0%
    0
    explanation
    0%
    0

  • #2
    Faruque:
    the explanation rests on the -fe- machinery, no matter the instrumental variable approach.
    As reported in any decent panel data econometrics textbook, -fe- estimator gets rid of time-invariant predictors. If age, education and experience do not vary across the data waves, Stata returns exactly what should be expected.
    Kind regards,
    Carlo
    (Stata 19.0)

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Carlo,
      Thank you very much for your reply. Do you think its better to remove these variables from regression?
      Thanks in advance.

      Sincerely,
      Faruque.

      Comment


      • #4
        Faruque:
        not quite.
        The right approach is to investigate via -hausman- which specification (-fe- or -re-) fits your data better.
        Kind regards,
        Carlo
        (Stata 19.0)

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you so much Carlo.

          Comment


          • #6

            Hello Mr. Carlo,

            I am trying to run DID regression to find out the impact of a decision support tool on farmers yield productivity.

            I have total sample of 168 farmers which is divided into 2 farmers group (group A and B), each group conatins 84 farmers. In Group A, 42 farmers are from region "a" and other 42 from region 'b". For Group B the farmers and their regions segmented similarly. The data set also contains before (2016) and after (2017) condition of the respondents.

            In 2016 none of the farmers from Group A and B used this facility. But In 2017 "Group A" farmers have adopted but "Group B" farmers did not.

            I kindly request you to please suggest me how to create treatment and control condition for this study.

            Thank you very much in advance.

            Sincerely,
            Faruque

            Comment


            • #7
              Differences-in-Differences (using Stata)

              https://dss.princeton.edu/training/DID101.pdf

              Comment


              • #8

                Thank you so much Eric.

                Comment

                Working...
                X