Hi all!
Currently, I'm working on my thesis about CSR (archival panel data). I have little experience with stata so I need some help regarding regression analyses
In my study, I'm looking at the effect of misaligning internal CSR actions (what firms actualy do internally about csr. e.g. policies) with external CSR actions (what firms report about csr. e.g. claims and disclosure). My first two hypotheses are:
H1: The sum of internal and external csr actions have a positive effect on market value
H2: The gap of internal and external csr actions (absolute value) have a negative effect on the market value (e.g. due greenwashing , or on the other hand due a lack of transparancy)
However, this looks a lot like a different study. So additionally, I want to look separately (Exceeding internal actions causes lack of transparancy and credibility, where Exceeding external actions may cause to be identified as greenwashing) to the effect on the market value.
So my idea was to develop another 2 hypotheses (H3a Exceeding internal actions is negatively associated with market value & H3b Exceeding external actions is negatively associated with market value). In other words, the original sample will be splitted into firms that exceed in external actions and firms that exceed in internal actions. I've never worked with a split sample and don't know how to apply this in stata (first time that I use stata).
I'd like to hear your thoughts,
Kind regards,
Stefan
PS: if this question already is asked, my apologies, I couldn't find it.
Currently, I'm working on my thesis about CSR (archival panel data). I have little experience with stata so I need some help regarding regression analyses
In my study, I'm looking at the effect of misaligning internal CSR actions (what firms actualy do internally about csr. e.g. policies) with external CSR actions (what firms report about csr. e.g. claims and disclosure). My first two hypotheses are:
H1: The sum of internal and external csr actions have a positive effect on market value
H2: The gap of internal and external csr actions (absolute value) have a negative effect on the market value (e.g. due greenwashing , or on the other hand due a lack of transparancy)
However, this looks a lot like a different study. So additionally, I want to look separately (Exceeding internal actions causes lack of transparancy and credibility, where Exceeding external actions may cause to be identified as greenwashing) to the effect on the market value.
So my idea was to develop another 2 hypotheses (H3a Exceeding internal actions is negatively associated with market value & H3b Exceeding external actions is negatively associated with market value). In other words, the original sample will be splitted into firms that exceed in external actions and firms that exceed in internal actions. I've never worked with a split sample and don't know how to apply this in stata (first time that I use stata).
I'd like to hear your thoughts,
Kind regards,
Stefan
PS: if this question already is asked, my apologies, I couldn't find it.
Comment