Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • heteroskedastic multiple regression

    Hello everyone,

    Considering, using Hetroskedastic multiple regression, as the residual vs fitted graphs is in funnel shape for the multiple regression. Only one variable is found to be violating homoscedasticity. While the coefficients and p-values from both the results appear, wondering whether the choice of Hetroskedastic multiple regression is right.
    Looking for some papers to understand how the results are interpreted and presented. Could not find any papers on Google Scholar. Appreciate any pointers.

    Thanks!

  • #2
    Are you thinking of using the hetregress command? The Stata manual entry for hetregress has some references. Along with examples and explanations of its own.
    -------------------------------------------
    Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
    StataNow Version: 19.5 MP (2 processor)

    EMAIL: [email protected]
    WWW: https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for the reply!
      Read the Stata 15 manual. For example, if I have to understand how to interpret these results, I am looking at some cited work to learn.


      Code:
      . hetregress food_exp income, het(logincome)
      
      Fitting full model:
      
      Iteration 0: log likelihood = -227.889
      
      Iteration 1: log likelihood = -226.61039
      
      Iteration 2: log likelihood = -225.72188
      
      Iteration 3: log likelihood = -225.71519
      
      Iteration 4: log likelihood = -225.71519
      
      Heteroskedastic linear regression Number of obs = 40
      
      ML estimation
      
      Wald chi2(1) = 135.11
      
      Log likelihood = -225.7152 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

      Comment

      Working...
      X