Hi all,
I ran the command -areg y1 x2 x3 x4 i.year , absorb (clustervar) to test my hypothesis. However, I came to the conclusion that my dependent variable: the net score of CSR (CSR strengths-CSR concerns obtained from WRDS) might not be a true interval variable and OLS regressions aren't appropriate. First question: someone agrees/disagrees with this? I can't find any scientific findings about this.
Second question: What is the difference between my areg command and the command : -xtreg y1 x2 x3 x4 i.year, fe , when I set the same cluster variable before with xtset (clustervar)? I found a paper which paper which uses the fixed effects model to test X on the net score of CSR as well (similair setting as my thesis) and they used a fixed effects model. However, when I run a fixed effect regression I don't find any differences with the -areg command.
Thanks in advance!
I ran the command -areg y1 x2 x3 x4 i.year , absorb (clustervar) to test my hypothesis. However, I came to the conclusion that my dependent variable: the net score of CSR (CSR strengths-CSR concerns obtained from WRDS) might not be a true interval variable and OLS regressions aren't appropriate. First question: someone agrees/disagrees with this? I can't find any scientific findings about this.
Second question: What is the difference between my areg command and the command : -xtreg y1 x2 x3 x4 i.year, fe , when I set the same cluster variable before with xtset (clustervar)? I found a paper which paper which uses the fixed effects model to test X on the net score of CSR as well (similair setting as my thesis) and they used a fixed effects model. However, when I run a fixed effect regression I don't find any differences with the -areg command.
Thanks in advance!
Comment