Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Help with heteroscedstisity

    Dear all,

    I am currently having to test small sample ( 20 ) of crossectional data with 7 regressors.

    Currently, I have done Breush-Pegan and White test for heteroscedasticity but I'd like to run any others that might help.


    I hope you can help with name and command in Stata


    Thank you for the time spent!

    Simeon!

  • #2
    help regress postestimation
    help estat hettest

    make diagnostic plots

    https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l25.pdf
    http://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/web...n-diagnostics/

    Comment


    • #3
      Dear Simeon,

      Heteroskedaticity is the least of your problems: estimating 8 parameters form 20 observations is asking too much form the data and standard inference is unlikely to be valid even if you have homoskedasticity. Anyway, the heteroskedasticity tests are only asymptotically valid and they will be of little use in this context.

      Best wishes,

      Joao
      PS: Nick Cox -whitetest- produces a result in this case but I do not think the test is feasible because there are not enough degrees of freedom. Can you clarify?

      Comment


      • #4
        Simeon:
        welcome to the list.
        As an aside to Joao's helpful recommendations, please consider that 20 observations per predictor are advised for multiple regression (Katz MH. Multivariable Analysis. Second Edtion. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 81), even though 10 obs per predictor may sound wise enough.
        Kind regards,
        Carlo
        (Stata 19.0)

        Comment


        • #5
          Following up on Carlo's comment, the results in Portnoy (1988) suggest that in general we need k2/n to go to zero as n goes to infinity (where n is the sample size and k is the number of parameters). So, if the number of parameters to estimate is large enough, even 20 observations per parameter won't be enough for reliable inference.

          Best wishes,

          Joao

          Comment


          • #6
            Dear all,

            Thank you for the good responses!

            I know that the sample size is small but I can't do anything. This is because it is part of university assignment and it is killing us to do any part of it with this small sample.

            Still, I have to
            Describe and use an alternative procedure which one might use to test for the
            presence of heteroskedasticity in the disturbances of a regression equation
            . Before that, we made a Breush-Pegantest.


            So anything that you could suggest?

            Comment


            • #7
              Such a small sample "invites" to a Bayesian approach as well.

              That said, under "real life" conditions, 7 predictors for 20 observations, as previously commented, is just pushing too much the envelope.

              With regards to assignments, being this the case, please take a look at this FAQ , particularly the topic 4.
              Best regards,

              Marcos

              Comment


              • #8
                I know that it is not good to help with homework and this is why I do not say anything about the data or what exactly I can see in it.

                I am just asking for material to read and any suggestions on what can be done

                Thank you all in advance

                Comment


                • #9
                  Simeon:
                  see:
                  -help regress postestimation plots-
                  -help regress postestimation##estatimtest-
                  Eventually, you might find the following textbook useful: http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTi...HEP000911.html
                  Kind regards,
                  Carlo
                  (Stata 19.0)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X