Dear Statalisters
As I read in this article,
1- for time-dependent covariates there are no need to test any violation of the proportional hazards assumptions (page-7).
2- natural logarithms of firms' annual age are used as baseline hazard function (page-23). Could you please let me know what is the difference between panel logistic regression and discrete time survival analysis except including a baseline hazard?
Really, If I include time dummy variables (12 dummy variables) in the model, it would take a long time to implement or it reports not concave.
3- it uses random effects because some firms are more ‘frail’ and thus have a higher likelihood of experiencing default (page-8). Could you please let me know if there is no deed to do Hausman, Breusch-Pagan, Chow tests in order to determine fixed effects vs random effects should be used?
4- Could you please let me know why in Stata the result of implementing random effects parametric survival model is different from that of implementing random effects panel logistic? I know that the former reports hazard rate but the latter reports odds ratio. However, the significance of predictors also are different.
a- statistics-longitudinal/panel data-binary outcomes-logistic regression
b- statistics-longitudinal/panel data-parametric survival regression.
Is it necessary for both to include baseline hazard function (ln(time))?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
As I read in this article,
1- for time-dependent covariates there are no need to test any violation of the proportional hazards assumptions (page-7).
2- natural logarithms of firms' annual age are used as baseline hazard function (page-23). Could you please let me know what is the difference between panel logistic regression and discrete time survival analysis except including a baseline hazard?
Really, If I include time dummy variables (12 dummy variables) in the model, it would take a long time to implement or it reports not concave.
3- it uses random effects because some firms are more ‘frail’ and thus have a higher likelihood of experiencing default (page-8). Could you please let me know if there is no deed to do Hausman, Breusch-Pagan, Chow tests in order to determine fixed effects vs random effects should be used?
4- Could you please let me know why in Stata the result of implementing random effects parametric survival model is different from that of implementing random effects panel logistic? I know that the former reports hazard rate but the latter reports odds ratio. However, the significance of predictors also are different.
a- statistics-longitudinal/panel data-binary outcomes-logistic regression
b- statistics-longitudinal/panel data-parametric survival regression.
Is it necessary for both to include baseline hazard function (ln(time))?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Comment